Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29597
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Evidence for odour-mediated assortative mating in humans: The impact of hormonal contraception and artificial fragrances
Author(s): Allen, Caroline
Havlicek, Jan
Williams, Kate
Roberts, S Craig
Contact Email: craig.roberts@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Homogamy
Fragrance
Hormonal contraception
Assortative mating
Body odour
Olfaction
Issue Date: 15-Oct-2019
Date Deposited: 29-May-2019
Citation: Allen C, Havlicek J, Williams K & Roberts SC (2019) Evidence for odour-mediated assortative mating in humans: The impact of hormonal contraception and artificial fragrances. Physiology and Behavior, 210, Art. No.: 112541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.05.002
Abstract: There is substantial evidence for assortative partner preferences in humans based on physical characteristics. In contrast, evidence suggests that olfactory preferences tend to be disassortative, with people preferring body odour of potential partners who are dissimilar at key genetic loci, perhaps to gain fitness advantage through offspring heterozygosity. We compared ratings of perceived body odour similarity of real couples with those of randomly paired ‘fake’ couples. Contrary to prediction, we find that odours of real partners are perceived more, rather than less, similar to each other than fake couples. However, this applied only to natural odour samples: there were no differences in similarity levels of real and fake couples' samples which were collected while wearing artificial fragrances. Furthermore, in light of suggestions that hormonal contraception (HC) disrupts disassortative odour preferences in women, we compared odour similarity among real couples in which the female partner was using or not using HC at the time when the relationship began. We find that odours of HC-using couples are of intermediate similarity between non-using and fake couples, suggesting that HC use during partner choice could affect odour-influenced assortment. We also examined the association between relationship satisfaction and perceived similarity of unfragranced odours of real couples. We found that these are positively correlated in male partners but negatively correlated in the female partners, indicative of a sex difference in the relative favourability of odour similarity in partner preference. Finally, by comparing odour similarity ratings with those given by perfumers using a novel olfactory lexicon we found evidence that similarity judgements were based on the Spicy/Animalic aspects of individual odour profiles. Taken together, our results challenge the conventional view that odour-mediated partner preferences in humans are typically disassortative.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.05.002
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Allen C, Havlicek J, Williams K & Roberts SC (2019) Evidence for odour-mediated assortative mating in humans: The impact of hormonal contraception and artificial fragrances. Physiology and Behavior, 210, Art. No.: 112541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.05.002 © 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FinalSubmittedVersion.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version681.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.