Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29463
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Are sex differences in preferences for physical attractiveness and good earning capacity in potential mates smaller in countries with greater gender equality?
Author(s): Zhang, Lingshan
Lee, Anthony J
DeBruine, Lisa M
Jones, Benedict C
Contact Email: anthony.lee@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: sex differences
mate preferences
gender inequality
attractiveness
status
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2019
Date Deposited: 8-May-2019
Citation: Zhang L, Lee AJ, DeBruine LM & Jones BC (2019) Are sex differences in preferences for physical attractiveness and good earning capacity in potential mates smaller in countries with greater gender equality?. Evolutionary Psychology, 17 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919852921
Abstract: On average, women show stronger preferences for mates with good earning capacity than men do, while men show stronger preferences for physically attractive mates than women do. Studies reporting that sex differences in mate preferences are smaller in countries with greater gender equality have been interpreted as evidence that these sex differences in mate preferences are caused by the different roles society imposes on men and women. Here we attempted to replicate previously reported links between sex differences in mate preferences and country-level measures of gender inequality in a sample of 3073 participants from 36 countries (data and code available at https://osf.io/4sr5f/). Although women preferred mates with good earning capacity more than men did and men preferred physically attractive mates more than women did, we found little evidence that these sex differences were smaller in countries with greater gender equality. Although one analysis suggested that the sex difference in preferences for good earning capacity was smaller in countries with greater gender equality, this effect was not significant when controlling for Galton’s problem or when correcting for multiple comparisons. Collectively, these results provide little support for the social roles account of sex differences in mate preferences.
DOI Link: 10.1177/1474704919852921
Rights: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1474704919852921.pdfFulltext - Published Version413.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.