Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29056
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGiannini, Tereza Cristinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Daniel S.en_UK
dc.contributor.authorSaraiva, Antonio Mauroen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAlves-dos-Santos, Isabelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBiesmeijer, Jacobus C.en_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-21T01:03:42Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-21T01:03:42Z-
dc.date.issued2013-06-30en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29056-
dc.description.abstractBiotic interactions have been considered as an important factor to be included in species distribution modelling, but little is known about how different types of interaction or different strategies for modelling affect model performance. This study compares different methods for including interspecific interactions in distribution models for bees, their brood parasites, and the plants they pollinate. Host-parasite interactions among bumble bees (genus Bombus: generalist pollinators and brood parasites) and specialist plant-pollinator interactions between Centris bees and Krameria flowers were used as case studies. We used 7 different modelling algorithms available in the BIOMOD R package. For Bombus, the inclusion of interacting species distributions generally increased model predictive accuracy. The improvement was better when the interacting species was included with its raw distribution rather than with its modeled suitability. However, incorporating the distributions of non-interacting species sometimes resulted in similarly increased model accuracy despite their being no significance of any interaction for the distribution. For the Centris-Krameria system the best strategy for modelling biotic interactions was to include the interacting species model-predicted values. However, the results were less consistent than those for Bombus species, and most models including biotic interactions showed no significant improvement over abiotic models. Our results are consistent with previous studies showing that biotic interactions can be important in structuring species distributions at regional scales. However, correlations between species distributions are not necessarily indicative of interactions. Therefore, choosing the correct biotic information, based on biological and ecological knowledge, is critical to improve the accuracy of species distribution models and forecast distribution change.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)en_UK
dc.relationGiannini TC, Chapman DS, Saraiva AM, Alves-dos-Santos I & Biesmeijer JC (2013) Improving species distribution models using biotic interactions: a case study of parasites, pollinators and plants. Ecography, 36 (6), pp. 649-656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07191.xen_UK
dc.titleImproving species distribution models using biotic interactions: a case study of parasites, pollinators and plantsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07191.xen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEcographyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1600-0587en_UK
dc.citation.issn0906-7590en_UK
dc.citation.volume36en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.spage649en_UK
dc.citation.epage656en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissionen_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emaildaniel.chapman@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date19/11/2012en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sao Pauloen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sao Pauloen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sao Pauloen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNaturalis Biodiversity Centeren_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000319290600002en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84878156397en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1100315en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1836-4112en_UK
dc.date.accepted2012-09-18en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-09-18en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-03-07en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorGiannini, Tereza Cristina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChapman, Daniel S.|0000-0003-1836-4112en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSaraiva, Antonio Mauro|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAlves-dos-Santos, Isabel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBiesmeijer, Jacobus C.|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|European Commission (Horizon 2020)|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-03-07en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2019-03-07|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameImproving species distribution models using biotic interactions a case study of parasites_ pollinators and plants.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1600-0587en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Improving species distribution models using biotic interactions a case study of parasites_ pollinators and plants.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.