Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28607
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, Toneya Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Anthony Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSidari, Morgan Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStower, Rebecca Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorSherlock, James Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorDixson, Barnaby J Wen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-24T01:02:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-24T01:02:33Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-08en_UK
dc.identifier.othere0178206en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28607-
dc.description.abstractWomen’s preferences for men’s androgen dependent secondary sexual traits are proposed to be phenotypically plastic in response to exposure to pathogens and pathogen disgust. While previous studies report that masculinity in facial shape is more attractive to women who have recently been exposed to pathogenic cues and who are high in self-reported pathogen disgust, facial hair may reduce male attractiveness under conditions of high pathogens as beards are a possible breeding ground for disease carrying ectoparasites. In the present study, we test whether women’s preferences for beardedness and facial masculinity vary due to exposure to different pathogenic cues. Participants (N = 688, mean age + 1SD = 31.94 years, SD = 6.69, range = 18–67) rated the attractiveness of facial composite stimuli of men when they were clean-shaven or fully bearded. These stimuli were also manipulated in order to vary sexual dimorphism by ±50%. Ratings were conducted before and after exposure to one of four experimental treatments in which participants were primed to either high pathogens (e.g. infected cuts), ectoparasites (e.g. body lice), a mixture of pathogens and ectoparasites, or a control condition (e.g. innocuous liquids). Participants then completed the three-domain disgust scale measuring attitudes to moral, sexual and pathogen disgust. We predicted that women would prefer facial masculinity following exposure to pathogenic cues, but would show reduced preferences for facial hair following exposure to ectoparasites. Women preferred full beards over clean-shaven faces and masculinised over feminised faces. However, none of the experimental treatments influenced the direction of preferences for facial masculinity or beardedness. We also found no association between women’s self-reported pathogen disgust and their preferences for facial masculinity. However, there was a weak positive association between moral disgust scores and preferences for facial masculinity, which might reflect conservatism and preferences for gender typicality in faces. Women’s preferences for beards were positively associated with their pathogen disgust, which runs contrary to our predictions and may reflect preferences for high quality individuals who can withstand any costs of beardedness, although further replications are necessary before firm conclusions can be made. We conclude that there is little support for pathogenic exposure being a mechanism that underpins women’s directional preferences for masculine traits.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_UK
dc.relationMcIntosh TL, Lee AJ, Sidari MJ, Stower RE, Sherlock JM & Dixson BJW (2017) Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women's preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness?. PLOS ONE, 12 (6), Art. No.: e0178206. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178206en_UK
dc.rights© 2017 McIntosh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleMicrobes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women's preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0178206en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid28594843en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS ONEen_UK
dc.citation.issn1932-6203en_UK
dc.citation.volume12en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderAustralian Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date08/06/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000402923200021en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85020375320en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1093450en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0911-1244en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-05-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-05-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-01-22en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcIntosh, Toneya L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLee, Anthony J|0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSidari, Morgan J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStower, Rebecca E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSherlock, James M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDixson, Barnaby J W|0000-0003-0911-1244en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Australian Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000923en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-01-23en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-01-23|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejournal.pone.0178206.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0178206.pdfFulltext - Published Version15.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.