Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28605
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDixson, Barnaby J Wen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Anthony Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBlake, Khandis Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorJasienska, Grazynaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMarcinkowska, Urszula Men_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-24T01:01:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-24T01:01:55Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-31en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28605-
dc.description.abstractAccording to the ovulatory shift hypothesis, women's mate preferences for male morphology indicative of competitive ability, social dominance, and/or underlying health are strongest at the peri-ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. However, recent meta-analyses are divided on the robustness of such effects and the validity of the often-used indirect estimates of fertility and ovulation has been called into question in methodological studies. In the current study, we test whether women's preferences for men's beardedness, a cue of male sexual maturity, androgenic development and social dominance, are stronger at the peri-ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle compared to during the early follicular or the luteal phase. We also tested whether levels of estradiol, progesterone, and the estradiol to progesterone ratio at each phase were associated with facial hair preferences. Fifty-two heterosexual women completed a two-alternative forced choice preference test for clean-shaven and bearded male faces during the follicular, peri-ovulatory (validated by the surge in luteinizing hormone or the drop in estradiol levels) and luteal phases. Participants also provided for one entire menstrual cycle daily saliva samples for subsequent assaying of estradiol and progesterone. Results showed an overall preference for bearded over clean-shaven faces at each phase of the menstrual cycle. However, preferences for facial hair were not significantly different over the phases of menstrual cycle and were not significantly associated with levels of reproductive hormones. We conclude that women's preferences for men's beardedness may not be related to changes in their likelihood of conception.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationDixson BJW, Lee AJ, Blake KR, Jasienska G & Marcinkowska UM (2018) Women's preferences for men's beards show no relation to their ovarian cycle phase and sex hormone levels. Hormones and Behavior, 97, pp. 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.11.006en_UK
dc.rightsAccepted refereed manuscript of: Dixson BJ, Lee AJ, Blake KR, Jasienska G & Marcinkowska UM (2018) Women's preferences for men's beards show no relation to their ovarian cycle phase and sex hormone levels. Hormones and Behavior, 97, pp. 137-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.11.006 © 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectFacial attractivenessen_UK
dc.subjectMenstrual cycleen_UK
dc.subjectFacial hairen_UK
dc.subjectSexual selectionen_UK
dc.titleWomen's preferences for men's beards show no relation to their ovarian cycle phase and sex hormone levelsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.11.006en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29129624en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHormones and Behavioren_UK
dc.citation.issn0018-506Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume97en_UK
dc.citation.spage137en_UK
dc.citation.epage144en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNarodowe Centrum Naukien_UK
dc.citation.date06/12/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of New South Walesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationJagiellonian Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationJagiellonian Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000423419100019en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85036632881en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1093490en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-11-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-11-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-01-22en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDixson, Barnaby J W|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLee, Anthony J|0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBlake, Khandis R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJasienska, Grazyna|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMarcinkowska, Urszula M|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University of Queensland|en_UK
local.rioxx.project2014/12/S/NZ8/00722|Narodowe Centrum Nauki|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-01-23en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2018-12-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2019-01-23|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameManuscript.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0018-506Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Manuscript.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version495.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.