Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27194
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBradfer-Lawrence, Tomen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Nicken_UK
dc.contributor.authorDent, Daisyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-04T03:30:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-04T03:30:02Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-30en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27194-
dc.description.abstractSecondary forest habitats are increasingly recognized for their potential to conserve biodiversity in the tropics. However, the development of faunal assemblages in secondary forest systems varies according to habitat quality and species‐specific traits. In this study, we predicted that the recovery of bird assemblages is dependent on secondary forest age and level of isolation, the forest stratum examined, and the species’ traits of feeding guild and body mass. This study was undertaken in secondary forests in central Panama; spanning a chronosequence of 60‐, 90‐, and 120‐year‐old forests, and in neighboring old‐growth forest. To give equal attention to all forest strata, we employed a novel method that paired simultaneous surveys in canopy and understory. This survey method provides a more nuanced picture than ground‐based studies, which are biased toward understory assemblages. Bird reassembly varied according to both habitat age and isolation, although it was challenging to separate these effects, as the older sites were also more isolated than the younger sites. In combination, habitat age and isolation impacted understory birds more than canopy‐dwelling birds. Proportions of dietary guilds did not vary with habitat age, but were significantly different between strata. Body mass distributions were similar across forest ages for small‐bodied birds, but older forest supported more large‐bodied birds, probably due to control of poaching at these sites. Canopy assemblages were characterized by higher species richness, and greater variation in both dietary breadth and body mass, relative to understory assemblages. The results highlight that secondary forests may offer critical refugia for many bird species, particularly specialist canopy‐dwellers. However, understory bird species may be less able to adapt to novel and isolated habitats and should be the focus of conservation efforts encouraging bird colonization of secondary forests.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationBradfer-Lawrence T, Gardner N & Dent D (2018) Canopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in Neotropical secondary forest. Ecology and Evolution, 8 (11), pp. 5586-5597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4086en_UK
dc.relation.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11667/107en_UK
dc.rights© 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectavianen_UK
dc.subjectcolonizationen_UK
dc.subjectconservationen_UK
dc.subjectPanamaen_UK
dc.subjectreassemblyen_UK
dc.subjectsecondary foresten_UK
dc.titleCanopy bird assemblages are less influenced by habitat age and isolation than understory bird assemblages in Neotropical secondary foresten_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ece3.4086en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29938076en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEcology and Evolutionen_UK
dc.citation.issn2045-7758en_UK
dc.citation.volume8en_UK
dc.citation.issue11en_UK
dc.citation.spage5586en_UK
dc.citation.epage5597en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date27/04/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSmithsonian Tropical Research Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000435776600033en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85048721686en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid875799en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6045-4360en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1219-7344en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-03-24en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-03-24en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-05-01en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBradfer-Lawrence, Tom|0000-0001-6045-4360en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGardner, Nick|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDent, Daisy|0000-0002-1219-7344en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-05-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-05-01|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBradfer-Lawrence_et_al-2018-Ecology_and_Evolution.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bradfer-Lawrence_et_al-2018-Ecology_and_Evolution.pdfFulltext - Published Version663.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.