Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26960
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Carolineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHavlicek, Janen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craigen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-04T02:04:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-04T02:04:18Z-
dc.date.issued2018-04en_UK
dc.identifier.othere12314en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26960-
dc.description.abstractHuman axillary (armpit) odours are highly diverse and have potential to reveal a wide range of individual information. This is echoed in gas chromatography findings, which show that axillary odours are comprised of many volatile compounds. Despite this, only a small number of verbal descriptors are used when investigating the perceptual qualities of body odours. We set out to develop a lexicon that would capture these perceptual qualities in more detail, working alongside perfumers and fragrance evaluators in order to benefit from their expertise in olfactory perception and semantic labelling of odours. Four experts developed a list of 15 verbal descriptors based on an exemplar set of male and female axillary samples, and then rated 62 samples (31 men and 31 women) using these. We explored the predictive value of these ratings, finding that subsets of descriptors distinguished male from female samples, appearing to be more reliable than explicit judgments of odour sex. Practical applications. This lexicon was successful in discriminating sex of odour samples and could enable improved understanding of other perceptual qualities of human odour. For example, it could be possible to link specific perceptual qualities to specific cues (e.g. symmetry, masculinity) or to manipulate odours based on perceptual qualities in experimental settings, with direct practical implications for odour researchers. Furthermore, the existence of such a lexicon will allow body odours to be categorised for practical purposes. For example, such categorisation will facilitate exploration of how fragrances, ingredients or accords may interact with and complement different body odour types.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationAllen C, Havlicek J, Williams K & Roberts SC (2018) Perfume experts' perceptions of body odors: Towards a new lexicon for body odor description. Journal of Sensory Studies, 33 (2), Art. No.: e12314. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12314en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Allen C, Havlíček J, Williams K, Roberts SC. Perfume experts' perceptions of body odors: Toward a new lexicon for body odor description. Journal of Sensory Studies 2018;33:e12314, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12314. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.titlePerfume experts' perceptions of body odors: Towards a new lexicon for body odor descriptionen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2019-01-23en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Allen et al_JoSS_final version.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/joss.12314en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Sensory Studiesen_UK
dc.citation.issn1745-459Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0887-8250en_UK
dc.citation.volume33en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date22/01/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSeven Scenten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000429325100001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85044920534en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid878034en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-01-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-04-10en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAllen, Caroline|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHavlicek, Jan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilliams, Kate|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-01-23en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2019-01-22en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2019-01-23|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameAllen et al_JoSS_final version.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0887-8250en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Allen et al_JoSS_final version.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version746.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.