|Appears in Collections:||Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Combined use of open-air and indoor fumigation systems to study effects of SO2 on leaching processes in Scots pine litter|
|Citation:||Wookey P & Ineson P (1991) Combined use of open-air and indoor fumigation systems to study effects of SO2 on leaching processes in Scots pine litter, Environmental Pollution, 74 (4), pp. 325-343.|
|Abstract:||Both an open-air fumigation system and a laboratory-based system were used to expose decomposing Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles to controlled concentrations of SO2 (arithmetic mean ≤48 nl litre-1) during a period, in total, of 301 days. The experimental design involved reciprocal litter transplants from 'clean' to 'polluted' air and vice versa, using the two fumigation systems. The objectives were (1) to observe the effects of SO2 on leachate and litter chemistry, (2) to assess whether pollution-induced changes are reversible in clean air, and (3) to test the suitability of small-scale fumigation chambers (litter microcosms) compared with open-air systems in soil studies. Through the formation of SO4 2- ions, dry-deposited SO2 exhibited a marked capacity to remove 'base' cations (Ca2+, Mg2+ and K+) from decomposing pine needles, and also to acidify litter leachates (as indicated by proton fluxes from the litter). When litter was transferred from polluted air (48 nl litre-1 SO2, in the open-air system) to either clean or polluted air in the laboratory, the effects of prior exposure to SO2 on leachate composition were still evident even after 86 days: the role of base cation depletion within the litter, caused by SO4 2--induced leaching, is discussed. Data for SO4 2- fluxes in leachates collected from the small-scale chambers indicated that dry deposition velocities for SO2 were not anomalously high within this fumigation system. It is therefore concluded that microcosm studies can provide information complementary to the open-air fumigation approach in soils research. © 1991.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|1-s2.0-026974919190079C-main.pdf||973.23 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.