Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26175
Appears in Collections: | Economics Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Unrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal |
Author(s): | Morton, Alec Adler, Amanda I Bell, David Briggs, Andrew Brouwer, Werner Claxton, Karl Craig, Neil Fischer, Alastair McGregor, Peter G van Baal, Pieter |
Keywords: | health technology assessment economic analysis cost effectiveness analysis costing unrelated future costs |
Issue Date: | Aug-2016 |
Date Deposited: | 21-Nov-2017 |
Citation: | Morton A, Adler AI, Bell D, Briggs A, Brouwer W, Claxton K, Craig N, Fischer A, McGregor PG & van Baal P (2016) Unrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. Health Economics, 25 (8), pp. 933-938. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3366 |
Abstract: | In this editorial, we consider the vexing issue of ‘unrelated future costs’ (for example, the costs of caring for people with dementia or kidney failure after preventing their deaths from a heart attack). The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance isnotto take such costs into account in technology appraisals. However, standard appraisal practice involves modelling the benefits of those unrelated technologies. We argue that there is a sound principled reason for including both the costs and benefits of unrelated care. Changing this practice would have material consequences for decisions about reimbursing particular technologies, and we urge future research to understand this better. |
DOI Link: | 10.1002/hec.3366 |
Rights: | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Morton, A., Adler, A. I., Bell, D., Briggs, A., Brouwer, W., Claxton, K., Craig, N., Fischer, A., McGregor, P., and van Baal, P. (2016) Unrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. Health Econ., 25: 933–938, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3366. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. |
Notes: | Output Type: Editorial |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Morton_etal_HE_2016_Reflections_on_NICE_guidance_to_the_methods_of_technology_appraisal.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 218.32 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.