Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26175
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorton, Alecen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAdler, Amanda Ien_UK
dc.contributor.authorBell, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrouwer, Werneren_UK
dc.contributor.authorClaxton, Karlen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Neilen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Alastairen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, Peter Gen_UK
dc.contributor.authorvan Baal, Pieteren_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-25T00:13:40Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-25T00:13:40Z-
dc.date.issued2016-08en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26175-
dc.description.abstractIn this editorial, we consider the vexing issue of ‘unrelated future costs’ (for example, the costs of caring for people with dementia or kidney failure after preventing their deaths from a heart attack). The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance isnotto take such costs into account in technology appraisals. However, standard appraisal practice involves modelling the benefits of those unrelated technologies. We argue that there is a sound principled reason for including both the costs and benefits of unrelated care. Changing this practice would have material consequences for decisions about reimbursing particular technologies, and we urge future research to understand this better.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationMorton A, Adler AI, Bell D, Briggs A, Brouwer W, Claxton K, Craig N, Fischer A, McGregor PG & van Baal P (2016) Unrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. Health Economics, 25 (8), pp. 933-938. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3366en_UK
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Morton, A., Adler, A. I., Bell, D., Briggs, A., Brouwer, W., Claxton, K., Craig, N., Fischer, A., McGregor, P., and van Baal, P. (2016) Unrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. Health Econ., 25: 933–938, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3366. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.subjecthealth technology assessmenten_UK
dc.subjecteconomic analysisen_UK
dc.subjectcost effectiveness analysisen_UK
dc.subjectcostingen_UK
dc.subjectunrelated future costsen_UK
dc.titleUnrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisalen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hec.3366en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27374115en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHealth Economicsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1099-1050en_UK
dc.citation.issn1057-9230en_UK
dc.citation.volume25en_UK
dc.citation.issue8en_UK
dc.citation.spage933en_UK
dc.citation.epage938en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.citation.date03/07/2016en_UK
dc.description.notesOutput Type: Editorialen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Strathclydeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomicsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationErasmus University, Rotterdamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Yorken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Health Scotlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's University Hospitals NHSen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Strathclydeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationErasmus University, Rotterdamen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000379939400001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84978878085en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid511435en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4538-6328en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-05-11en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-05-11en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-11-21en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMorton, Alec|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAdler, Amanda I|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBell, David|0000-0002-4538-6328en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBriggs, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrouwer, Werner|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorClaxton, Karl|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCraig, Neil|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFischer, Alastair|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGregor, Peter G|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorvan Baal, Pieter|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-11-21en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-11-21|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMorton_etal_HE_2016_Reflections_on_NICE_guidance_to_the_methods_of_technology_appraisal.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1057-9230en_UK
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Morton_etal_HE_2016_Reflections_on_NICE_guidance_to_the_methods_of_technology_appraisal.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version218.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.