|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Social support and regular physical activity: Does planning mediate this link?|
Sniehotta, Falko F
|Publisher:||British Psychological Society|
|Citation:||Molloy G, Dixon D, Hamer M & Sniehotta FF (2010) Social support and regular physical activity: Does planning mediate this link?, British Journal of Health Psychology, 15 (4), pp. 859-870.|
|Abstract:||Objectives: Social support for physical activity is reliably associated with regular physical activity, however the social cognitive processes, particularly post-intentional processes, that can explain this link have not been well characterised. In this study we examined the extent to which the relationship between social support for physical activity and subsequent physical activity can be accounted for by planning processes. Design & Method: The design was prospective observational and the sample consisted of 903 university students. Participants completed standard TPB, planning and physical activity measures at 2 time points, approximately 7 weeks apart. A gender stratified multiple mediation model was conducted to test the study hypotheses. Results: A significant interaction between social support and gender was observed. This indicated that lower levels of social support for physical activity were associated with lower levels of physical activity at time 2, for women only. In multiple mediation analysis this was partly explained by the indirect effects of social support through perceived behavioural control and coping planning. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of interpersonal processes in understanding the post-intentional determinants of regular physical activity. It is likely that planning processes relating to physical activity are often influenced by those in the ongoing immediate social environment who support this behaviour. Future development of theory and interventions should take account of the socially interactive nature of planning processes.|
|Rights:||Published in the British Journal of Health Psychology by the British Psychological Society.; Reproduced with permission from the British Journal of Health Psychology © The British Psychological Society 2010.|
University of Stirling
University College London
University of Aberdeen
|molloy et al BJHP 2010.doc||224 kB||Microsoft Word||View/Open|
|molloy et al BJHP 2010.pdf||173.68 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.