Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25426
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Expert Insight into the Assessment of Competence in Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy: A Qualitative Exploration of Experts' Experiences, Opinions and Recommendations
Authors: Muse, Kate
McManus, Freda
Contact Email: f.v.mcmanus@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: CBT
Cognitive–Behavioural Therapy
Competence
Clinical Skill
Assessment
Qualitative
Issue Date: May-2016
Citation: Muse K & McManus F (2016) Expert Insight into the Assessment of Competence in Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy: A Qualitative Exploration of Experts' Experiences, Opinions and Recommendations, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 23 (3), pp. 249-256.
Abstract: To offer insight into how cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) competence is defined, measured and evaluated and to highlight ways in which the assessment of CBT competence could be further improved, the current study utilizes a qualitative methodology to examine CBT experts' (N = 19) experiences of conceptualizing and assessing the competence of CBT therapists. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore participants' experiences of assessing the competence of CBT therapists. Interview transcripts were then analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis in order to identify commonalities and differences in the way CBT competence is evaluated. Four superordinate themes were identified: (i) what to assess, the complex and fuzzy concept of CBT competence; (ii) how to assess CBT competence, selecting from the toolbox of assessment methods; (iii) who is best placed to assess CBT competence, expertise and independence; and (iv) pitfalls, identifying and overcoming assessment biases. Priorities for future research and ways in which the assessment of CBT competence could be further improved are discussed in light of these findings.
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1952
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Muse_et_al-2016-Clinical_Psychology_&_Psychotherapy.pdf223.31 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 31/12/2999     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.