Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25402
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Trends in Child Protection across the UK – A Comparative Analysis (Forthcoming)
Authors: Bunting, Lisa
McCartan, Claire Jane
McGhee, Janice
Bywaters, Paul
Daniel, Brigid
Featherstone, Brid
Slater, Thomas
Contact Email: b.m.daniel@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Child protection
Children and families
Comparative social work
Cross-national research
Citation: Bunting L, McCartan CJ, McGhee J, Bywaters P, Daniel B, Featherstone B & Slater T (2017) Trends in Child Protection across the UK – A Comparative Analysis (Forthcoming), British Journal of Social Work.
Abstract: Although numerous international studies point to large variations in child welfare interventions, comparative analysis has tended to focus either solely on England or the UK as a whole, discounting differences across the four UK countries. This paper compares trends in national statistics relating to the operation of child protection systems across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland between 2004/5 and 2013/14. Despite a number of legislative, operational and definitional differences between nations, a number of trends are apparent. All systems show an increasing orientation towards child protection as evidenced by rising rates of child protection investigation and children subject to child protection planning. Increasingly, this relates to emotional abuse and involves younger children aged 0-4 years. However, the way cases are processed can differ with only one in ten referrals resulting in a child protection investigation in Northern Ireland compared to one in five in England. Potential reasons for these differences are discussed and questions raised as to why, more than quarter century after the introduction of the Children Act 1989, we still have no clear picture of the circumstances of families who come into contact with social services or the services provided to support them.
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FULL pre publication paper.pdf545.45 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 26/5/2020     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.