Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25402
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBunting, Lisaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcCartan, Claire Janeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGhee, Janiceen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBywaters, Paulen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDaniel, Brigiden_UK
dc.contributor.authorFeatherstone, Briden_UK
dc.contributor.authorSlater, Thomasen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-12T00:23:20Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-12T00:23:20Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-31en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/25402-
dc.description.abstractAlthough numerous international studies point to large variations in child welfare interventions, comparative analysis has tended to focus either solely on England or the UK as a whole, discounting differences across the four UK countries. This paper compares trends in national statistics relating to the operation of child protection systems across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland between 2004/5 and 2013/14. Despite a number of legislative, operational and definitional differences between nations, a number of trends are apparent. All systems show an increasing orientation towards child protection as evidenced by rising rates of child protection investigation and children subject to child protection planning. Increasingly, this relates to emotional abuse and involves younger children aged 0-4 years. However, the way cases are processed can differ with only one in ten referrals resulting in a child protection investigation in Northern Ireland compared to one in five in England. Potential reasons for these differences are discussed and questions raised as to why, more than quarter century after the introduction of the Children Act 1989, we still have no clear picture of the circumstances of families who come into contact with social services or the services provided to support them.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_UK
dc.relationBunting L, McCartan CJ, McGhee J, Bywaters P, Daniel B, Featherstone B & Slater T (2018) Trends in Child Protection across the UK – A Comparative Analysis. British Journal of Social Work, 48 (5), pp. 1154-1175. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx102en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in British Journal of Social Work following peer review. The version of record Lisa Bunting, Claire McCartan, Janice McGhee, Paul Bywaters, Brigid Daniel, Brid Featherstone, Tom Slater; Trends in Child Protection Across the UK: A Comparative Analysis, The British Journal of Social Work, Volume 48, Issue 5, 1 July 2018, Pages 1154–1175 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx102en_UK
dc.subjectChild protectionen_UK
dc.subjectChildren and familiesen_UK
dc.subjectComparative social worken_UK
dc.subjectCross-national researchen_UK
dc.titleTrends in Child Protection across the UK – A Comparative Analysisen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2019-10-18en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[FULL pre publication paper.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 24 months after online publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjsw/bcx102en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBritish Journal of Social Worken_UK
dc.citation.issn1468-263Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0045-3102en_UK
dc.citation.volume48en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage1154en_UK
dc.citation.epage1175en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailBDaniel@qmu.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date17/10/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen's University Belfasten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen's University Belfasten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCoventry Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSocial Worken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Huddersfielden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCardiff Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000440991200002en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85055510391en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid883977en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-05-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-05-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-05-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBunting, Lisa|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcCartan, Claire Jane|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGhee, Janice|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBywaters, Paul|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDaniel, Brigid|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFeatherstone, Brid|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSlater, Thomas|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-10-18en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2019-10-17en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2019-10-18|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameFULL pre publication paper.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0045-3102en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FULL pre publication paper.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version598.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.