Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24653
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Catastrophic thinking about pain: A critical appraisal highlighting the importance of the social context and balance
Authors: Caes, Line
Goubert, Liesbet
Sullivan, Michael J L
Chambers, Christine T
Contact Email: line.caes@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: catastrophizing
pain
distress
protective responses
communicative function
integrated model
balance
social system
Issue Date: 24-Oct-2013
Citation: Caes L, Goubert L, Sullivan MJL & Chambers CT (2013) Catastrophic thinking about pain: A critical appraisal highlighting the importance of the social context and balance, Journal of Symptoms and Signs, 2 (5), pp. 298-308.
Abstract: Numerous research studies have shown that endorsing a catastrophic interpretation about pain is associated with deleterious outcomes, such as higher levels of distress, pain intensity and disability for the person in pain. The fear-avoidance model has been found to be useful in explaining these associations by stressing that heightened feelings of distress and behaviour aimed at reducing or avoiding pain might be adaptive in an acute pain context but can become maladaptive when the pain becomes chronic. Pain is rarely a private event and the communal coping model underscores that the heightened pain expression in people endorsing catastrophic thoughts about pain could have a social, communicative function of eliciting empathic responses in others. However, these models are not all-encompassing. In particular, neither of the models takes into account the growing evidence indicating that catastrophic thinking in observers can also impact their emotional experience and behaviour in response to the other’s pain. Moreover, the context of multiple goals in which pain and pain behaviour occurs is largely ignored in both models. In this article we present an integrative perspective on catastrophic thinking that takes into account the social system and interplay between different goals people in pain and observers might pursue (e.g., school/work performance, leisure, social engagement). Specifically, this integrative perspective stresses the importance of considering the bidirectional influence between catastrophic thoughts in the person experiencing pain and observers. Furthermore, the importance of balance between pain-relief and other important goals as well as in the level of catastrophic thoughts in understanding the maladaptive influence of catastrophic thinking will be underlined. Clinical implications and future research directions of this integrated perspective are discussed.
URL: http://www.intermedcentral.hk/index.php?journal=jss&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=107
Rights: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Caes_etal_JSS_2013.pdf486.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.