Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24473
Appears in Collections:Economics eTheses
Title: Household financial decision making
Authors: Newall, Philip W S
Supervisor(s): Comerford, David
Delaney, Liam
Keywords: financial decision making
investing
behavioural science
judgment and decision making
psychology
gambling
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: University of Stirling
Citation: Newall, P. W. S. (2016). Downside financial risk is misunderstood. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(5), 416-423.
Newall, P. W. S. (2015). How bookies make your money. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(3), 225-231.
Newall, P. W. S., & Love, B. C. (2015). Nudging investors big and small toward better decisions. Decision, 2(4), 319-326.
Abstract: Households are nowadays required to make financial decisions of increasing complexity in an increasing number of domains. This thesis explores psychological mechanisms, behavior change interventions, and potential inhibitory factors underlying wise household financial decisions in the domains of gambling advertising and mutual fund investing. In-depth investigations of these two domains were chosen to balance the depth of topic coverage versus the wide breadth of modern financial decision making. UK soccer gambling advertising was investigated via two observational studies and a range of online experiments. The experiments found that soccer fans struggle to form coherent expectations for the complex bets featuring in UK soccer gambling advertising. Mutual fund investors have to balance a number of cues in their investment choices. Normatively, mutual fund investors should minimize fees. However, a number of investors choose to maximize past returns instead. Three chapters investigate how mutual fund fees and financial percentage returns are psychologically processed, in order to uncover beneficial behavior change interventions. Many participants processed percentages additively, rather than follow the correct multiplicative strategy. Both percentages and corresponding “small” currency amounts were associated with systematic biases. Participant responses were closest to the normative strategy when either past returns were framed as a “small” currency amount, or when fees were framed as a 10 year currency amount. “Some people invest based on past performance, but funds with low fees have the highest future results” was the most effective disclaimer at nudging fee-sensitivity against the real world status quo, “Past performance does not predict future results.”
Type: Thesis or Dissertation
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24473

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Philip Newall PhD thesis household financial decision making.docxPhD thesis3.8 MBMicrosoft WordView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.