Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24473
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorComerford, David-
dc.contributor.advisorDelaney, Liam-
dc.contributor.authorNewall, Philip W S-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-31T10:41:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-31T10:41:45Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationNewall, P. W. S. (2016). Downside financial risk is misunderstood. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(5), 416-423.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationNewall, P. W. S. (2015). How bookies make your money. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(3), 225-231.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationNewall, P. W. S., & Love, B. C. (2015). Nudging investors big and small toward better decisions. Decision, 2(4), 319-326.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24473-
dc.description.abstractHouseholds are nowadays required to make financial decisions of increasing complexity in an increasing number of domains. This thesis explores psychological mechanisms, behavior change interventions, and potential inhibitory factors underlying wise household financial decisions in the domains of gambling advertising and mutual fund investing. In-depth investigations of these two domains were chosen to balance the depth of topic coverage versus the wide breadth of modern financial decision making. UK soccer gambling advertising was investigated via two observational studies and a range of online experiments. The experiments found that soccer fans struggle to form coherent expectations for the complex bets featuring in UK soccer gambling advertising. Mutual fund investors have to balance a number of cues in their investment choices. Normatively, mutual fund investors should minimize fees. However, a number of investors choose to maximize past returns instead. Three chapters investigate how mutual fund fees and financial percentage returns are psychologically processed, in order to uncover beneficial behavior change interventions. Many participants processed percentages additively, rather than follow the correct multiplicative strategy. Both percentages and corresponding “small” currency amounts were associated with systematic biases. Participant responses were closest to the normative strategy when either past returns were framed as a “small” currency amount, or when fees were framed as a 10 year currency amount. “Some people invest based on past performance, but funds with low fees have the highest future results” was the most effective disclaimer at nudging fee-sensitivity against the real world status quo, “Past performance does not predict future results.”en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectfinancial decision makingen_GB
dc.subjectinvestingen_GB
dc.subjectbehavioural scienceen_GB
dc.subjectjudgment and decision makingen_GB
dc.subjectpsychologyen_GB
dc.subjectgamblingen_GB
dc.subject.lcshDecision makingen_GB
dc.subject.lcshHouseholds Economic aspectsen_GB
dc.subject.lcshGamblingen_GB
dc.titleHousehold financial decision makingen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.contributor.funderESRC / Scottish Governmenten_GB
dc.author.emailbc561@hotmail.comen_GB
Appears in Collections:Economics eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Philip Newall PhD thesis household financial decision making.docxPhD thesis3.8 MBMicrosoft WordView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.