|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Can we sustainably harvest ivory? (Forthcoming)|
Lee, Phyllis C
|Citation:||Lusseau D & Lee PC Can we sustainably harvest ivory? (Forthcoming), Current Biology.|
|Abstract:||Despite the 1989 ivory trade ban, elephants continue to be killed to harvest their tusks for ivory. Since 2008, this poaching has increased to unprecedented levels driven by consumer demand for ivory products. CITES is now considering to develop a legal ivory trade [1,2]. The proposal relies on three assumptions: i) harvest regulation will cease all illegal activities; ii) defined sustainable quotas can be enforced; iii) we can define meaningful sustainable quotas that come close to the current demand. We know that regulating harvest does not stop illegal takes. Despite whaling regulation after WWII, illegal whaling continued for decades . The introduction of wolf culls in the USA actually increased poaching activities  while one-off ivory sales in 1999 and 2008 did nothing to halt elephant poaching. Governance issues over the ivory supply chains, including stockpiling, make enforcing quotas challenging if not impossible [5,6]. We have not yet adequately assessed what could be a sustainable ivory yield. To do so, we develop a compartmental model composed of a two-sex age-structured demographic model and an ivory production and harvest model. We applied several offtake and quota strategies to define how much ivory could be sustainably harvested. We found that the sustainability space is very small. Only 100 to 150kg of ivory could be removed from a reference population of 1360 elephants, levels well below the current demand. Our study shows that lifting the ivory ban will not address the current poaching challenge. We should instead focus on reducing consumer demand.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Affiliation:||University of Aberdeen|
|Lusseau Lee preprint accepted version.pdf||931.17 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 25/8/2018 Request a copy|
|Lusseau Lee supplementary information accepted version.pdf||685.36 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 25/8/2018 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.