Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24161
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorBird, Clareen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBurd, Emmalinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWyman, Michaelen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-01T22:04:30Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-01T22:04:30Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-06en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24161-
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between culturable counts (CFU) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) cell equivalent counts ofEscherichia coliin dairy feces exposed to different environmental conditions and temperature extremes was investigated. Fecal samples were collected in summer and winter from dairy cowpats held under two treatments: field-exposed versus polytunnel-protected. A significant correlation in quantifiedE. coliwas recorded between the qPCR and culture-based methods (r= 0.82). Evaluation of the persistence profiles ofE. coliover time revealed no significant difference in theE. colinumbers determined as either CFU or gene copies during the summer for the field-exposed cowpats, whereas significantly higher counts were observed by qPCR for the polytunnel-protected cowpats, which were exposed to higher ambient temperatures. In winter, the qPCR returned significantly higher counts ofE. colifor the field-exposed cowpats, thus representing a reversal of the findings from the summer sampling campaign. Results from this study suggest that with increasing time post-defecation and with the onset of challenging environmental conditions, such as extremes in temperature, culture-based counts begin to underestimate the true resilience of viableE. colipopulations in livestock feces. This is important not only in the long term as the Earth changes in response to climate-change drivers but also in the short term during spells of extremely cold or hot weather.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherACS Publicationsen_UK
dc.relationOliver D, Bird C, Burd E & Wyman M (2016) Quantitative PCR Profiling of Escherichia coli in Livestock Feces Reveals Increased Population Resilience Relative to Culturable Counts under Temperature Extremes. Environmental Science and Technology, 50 (17), pp. 9497-9505. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02657en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleQuantitative PCR Profiling of Escherichia coli in Livestock Feces Reveals Increased Population Resilience Relative to Culturable Counts under Temperature Extremesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.est.6b02657en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27454176en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEnvironmental Science and Technologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1520-5851en_UK
dc.citation.issn0013-936Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume50en_UK
dc.citation.issue17en_UK
dc.citation.spage9497en_UK
dc.citation.epage9505en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emaildavid.oliver@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date25/07/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000382805800065en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84985993279en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid551077en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6200-562Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7500-5573en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2433-4879en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-07-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-07-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-08-31en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectRe-shaping models for forecast faecal pathogen risk to humansen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefNE/J004456/1en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorOliver, David|0000-0002-6200-562Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBird, Clare|0000-0002-7500-5573en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBurd, Emmalina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWyman, Michael|0000-0002-2433-4879en_UK
local.rioxx.projectNE/J004456/1|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-08-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2016-08-31|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameOliver-etal-EST-2016.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0013-936Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Oliver-etal-EST-2016.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.