|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Couple Functioning after Pediatric Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review|
|Authors:||Van, Schoors Marieke|
Alderfer, Melissa A
Verhofstadt, Lesley L
|Citation:||Van Schoors M, Caes L, Alderfer MA, Goubert L & Verhofstadt LL (2017) Couple Functioning after Pediatric Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review, Psycho-Oncology, 26 (5), pp. 608-616.|
|Abstract:||Objectives A systematic review was conducted to: 1) investigate couple functioning after a pediatric cancer diagnosis, and 2) examine theoretical and methodological tendencies and issues in this literature. Methods Searches of Web of Science, Pubmed, Cochrane, PsycInfo and Embase resulted in inclusion of 32 qualitative, quantitative or mixed method papers. Findings of these papers were extracted for summary. Results Most couples adapt well to the crisis of a pediatric cancer diagnosis in domains such as emotional closeness, support, marital satisfaction and general marital adjustment. However, most experience difficulties in the domain of sexual intimacy and reports on conflict are mixed across qualitative and quantitative studies. Conclusions This review illustrates the need for future research with a greater focus on the impact of a pediatric cancer diagnosis on the couple's functioning, conducted with use of appropriate theoretical frameworks and based on both partners’ reports. Improvements in research are needed to best inform couple-based interventions.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Van Schoors M, Caes L, Alderfer MA, Goubert L, Verhofstadt, L. Couple functioning after pediatric cancer diagnosis: a systematic review. Psycho-Oncology. 2017;26:608–616, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4204. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.|
|Van Schoors, Caes et al., in press.pdf||327.07 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 5/8/2017 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.