Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23281
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Sex Differences in the Perceived Dominance and Prestige of Women With and Without Cosmetics
Author(s): Mileva, Viktoria R
Jones, Alex L
Russell, Richard
Little, Anthony
Contact Email: v.r.mileva@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: cosmetics
sex differences
attractiveness
social status
jealousy
Issue Date: Oct-2016
Date Deposited: 3-Jun-2016
Citation: Mileva VR, Jones AL, Russell R & Little A (2016) Sex Differences in the Perceived Dominance and Prestige of Women With and Without Cosmetics. Perception, 45 (10), pp. 1166-1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616652053
Abstract: Women wearing cosmetics have been associated with a higher earning potential and higher status jobs. However, recent literature suggests that status can be accrued through two distinct routes: dominance and prestige (Henrich & Gil-White, 2001). In two experiments, we applied a standardized amount of cosmetics to female faces using computer software. We then asked participants to rate faces with and without cosmetics for various traits including attractiveness, dominance, and prestige. Men and women both rated the faces with cosmetics added as higher in attractiveness. However, only women rated faces with cosmetics as higher in dominance, while only men rated them as higher in prestige. In a follow up study, we investigated whether these enhanced perceptions of dominance from women were caused by jealousy. We found that women experience more jealousy toward women with cosmetics, and view these women as more attractive to men and more promiscuous. Our findings suggest that cosmetics may function as an extended phenotype and can alter other’s perceptions differently depending on the perceiver’s sex.
DOI Link: 10.1177/0301006616652053
Rights: Published in Perception by Sage Publications. Published version of the article on SAGE Journals at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0301006616652053

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
7702_MB_Manuscript_FINAL_03_06_16.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version377.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.