Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22721
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Trial Protocol: Using genotype to tailor prescribing of nicotine replacement therapy: A randomised controlled trial assessing impact of communication upon adherence
Authors: Marteau, Theresa M
Munafo, Marcus
Aveyard, Paul
Hill, Chloe
Whitwell, Sophia
Willis, Thomas A
Crockett, Rachel
Hollands, Gareth J
Johnstone, Elaine C
Wright, Alison J
Prevost, A Toby
Armstrong, David
Sutton, Stephen
Kinmouth, Ann Louise
Contact Email: rachel.crockett@stir.ac.uk
Issue Date: 9-Nov-2010
Publisher: BioMed Central
Citation: Marteau TM, Munafo M, Aveyard P, Hill C, Whitwell S, Willis TA, Crockett R, Hollands GJ, Johnstone EC, Wright AJ, Prevost AT, Armstrong D, Sutton S & Kinmouth AL (2010) Trial Protocol: Using genotype to tailor prescribing of nicotine replacement therapy: A randomised controlled trial assessing impact of communication upon adherence, BMC Public Health, 10 (1), Art. No.: 680.
Abstract: Background: The behavioural impact of pharmacogenomics is untested; informing smokers of genetic test results for responsiveness to smoking cessation medication may increase adherence to this medication. The objective of this trial is to estimate the impact upon adherence to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) of informing smokers that their oral dose of NRT has been tailored to a DNA analysis. Hypotheses to be tested are as follows:  I Adherence to NRT is greater among smokers informed that their oral dose of NRT is tailored to an analysis of DNA (genotype), compared to one tailored to nicotine dependence questionnaire score (phenotype).  II Amongst smokers who fail to quit at six months, motivation to make another quit attempt is lower when informed that their oral dose of NRT was tailored to genotype rather than phenotype.  Methods/Design: An open label, parallel groups randomised trial in which 630 adult smokers (smoking 10 or more cigarettes daily) using National Health Service (NHS) stop smoking services in primary care are randomly allocated to one of two groups:  i. NRT oral dose tailored by DNA analysis (OPRM1gene) (genotype), or  ii. NRT oral dose tailored by nicotine dependence questionnaire score (phenotype) The primary outcome is proportion of prescribed NRT consumed in the first 28 days following an initial quit attempt, with the secondary outcome being motivation to make another quit attempt, amongst smokers not abstinent at six months. Other outcomes include adherence to NRT in the first seven days and biochemically validated smoking abstinence at six months. The primary outcome will be collected on 630 smokers allowing sufficient power to detect a 7.5% difference in mean proportion of NRT consumed using a two-tailed test at the 5% level of significance between groups. The proportion of all NRT consumed in the first four weeks of quitting will be compared between arms using an independent samplest-test and by estimating the 95% confidence interval for observed between-arm difference in mean NRT consumption (Hypothesis I). Motivation to make another quit attempt will be compared between arms in those failing to quit by six months (Hypothesis II).  Discussion: This is the first clinical trial evaluating the behavioural impact on adherence of prescribing medication using genetic rather than phenotypic information. Specific issues regarding the choice of design for trials of interventions of this kind are discussed. Trial details
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22721
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-680
Rights: © Marteau et al. 2010 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Affiliation: King's College London
University of Bristol
University of Birmingham
King's College London
King's College London
King's College London
Psychology
King's College London
University of Oxford
King's College London
King's College London
King's College London
University of Cambridge
University of Cambridge

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Marteau et al_BMC PH_2010.pdf580.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.