Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22604
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Diversionary feeding: an effective management strategy for conservation conflict?
Authors: Kubasiewicz, Laura M
Bunnefeld, Nils
Tulloch, Ayesha I T
Quine, Christopher P
Park, Kirsty
Contact Email: nils.bunnefeld@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Conflict mitigation
Conservation management
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Decision analysis
Human-wildlife conflict
Supplementary feeding
Issue Date: Jan-2016
Publisher: Springer
Citation: Kubasiewicz LM, Bunnefeld N, Tulloch AIT, Quine CP & Park K (2016) Diversionary feeding: an effective management strategy for conservation conflict?, Biodiversity and Conservation, 25 (1), pp. 1-22.
Abstract: Human population growth has led to increased contact between people and wildlife, with adverse impacts for both, such as damage to economic crops and wildlife persecution. Diversionary feeding, where food is used to draw animals away from problem activities or locations, is sometimes proposed as a socially acceptable conservation action, but little information exists on its success or what influences its efficacy. Here, we review literature on diversionary feeding and evaluate factors contributing to its success or failure. Success varied greatly among studies and successful uptake of diversionary food did not consistently produce outcomes that met stakeholder objectives. Studies often failed to report results in sufficient detail to allow a quantitative evaluation of efficiency. Of 30 trials presented in 21 studies, 13 enabled assessment of outcomes related to the ultimate objective of reducing conflict (related to threatened prey density, crop yield or nuisance reports) and only five of these were considered successful by the researchers conducting the study. A grand mean increase of 15% in respective measures of success at the outcome stage was found across all studies. Although diversionary feeding is considered expensive, cost-effectiveness analyses were rarely conducted. Only a third of studies reported information on costs and benefits that could be used to inform future management actions. We propose a decision-making framework that incorporates ecological knowledge, financial costs and evidence from previous studies to aid the planning and implementation of diversionary feeding in an adaptive format. Future studies of diversionary feeding should clearly report objectives, results, costsand effort to allow the return-on-investment to be calculated for different levels of management effort.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22604
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1
Rights: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Affiliation: University of Stirling
Biological and Environmental Sciences
University of Queensland
Forest Research
Biological and Environmental Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kubasiewicz et al_Biodivers Conserv_2016.pdf575.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.