Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22241
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Ground-dwelling spider (Araneae) and carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) community assemblages in mixed and monoculture stands of oak (Quercus robur L./ Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)
Authors: Barsoum, Nadia
Fuller, Lauren
Ashwood, Francis
Reed, Katy
Bonnet-Lebrun, A-S
Leung, Felix
Contact Email: lauren.fuller@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Biodiversity
Oak (Quercus robur/petraea)
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)
Mixed woods
Spider
Carabid beetle
Issue Date: Jun-2014
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Barsoum N, Fuller L, Ashwood F, Reed K, Bonnet-Lebrun A & Leung F (2014) Ground-dwelling spider (Araneae) and carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) community assemblages in mixed and monoculture stands of oak (Quercus robur L./ Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), Forest Ecology and Management, 321, pp. 29-41.
Abstract: A mixed tree species composition is frequently proposed as a way to increase habitat heterogeneity and support greater biodiversity in commercial forests. However, although international forest policy is increasingly advocating stands of mixed tree species, there is evidence to question the biodiversity benefits conferred by such forests. Using active ground-dwelling spiders and carabid beetles as biodiversity indicator taxa, we investigated the effect of forest stand composition on spider and carabid beetle community structure and composition. We conducted pitfall trapping in the summer of 2011 in 42 plantation forest stands across three different geographical regions in the UK and Ireland. Three common plantation forest stand types were examined: oak monocultures, Scots pine monocultures, and intimate Scots pine and oak mixtures (oak ⩽60% cover). Forest stand type had a weak effect on spider and beetle species richness, with no significant differences in mixed stands compared with monocultures. There were few differences in species composition between the stand types in each region and indicator species analysis found few species specifically affiliated with any of the forest stand types. Land use history is hypothesised to have contributed, at least in part, to the observed important regional differences in spider and beetle assemblages. Our results do not support the perception that intimate mixtures of dominant tree species benefit biodiversity in plantation forest stands. Further research is required to determine the optimum percentages and planting patterns required for mixtures of canopy tree species in order to support forest biodiversity.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22241
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.063
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Affiliation: Forest Research
Biological and Environmental Sciences
Forest Research
Forest Research
Forest Research
Forest Research

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Barsoum et al 2013 - Mixes - Forest Ecology and Management.pdf577.18 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 31/12/2999     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.