Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22164
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The stroke ‘Act FAST’ campaign: Remembered but not understood?
Authors: Dombrowski, Stephan U
White, Martin
Mackintosh, Joan E
Gellert, Paul
Araujo-Soares, Vera
Thomson, Richard G
Rodgers, Helen
Ford, Gary A
Sniehotta, Falko F
Contact Email: s.u.dombrowski@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: acute stroke therapy
epidemiology
intervention
prevention
stroke
thrombolysis
Issue Date: Apr-2015
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Citation: Dombrowski SU, White M, Mackintosh JE, Gellert P, Araujo-Soares V, Thomson RG, Rodgers H, Ford GA & Sniehotta FF (2015) The stroke ‘Act FAST’ campaign: Remembered but not understood?, International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), pp. 324-330.
Abstract: Background: The stroke awareness raising campaign ‘Act FAST' (Face, Arms, Speech: Time to call Emergency Medical Services) has been rolled out in multiple waves in England, but impact on stroke recognition and response remains unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test whether providing knowledge of the FAST acronym through a standard Act FAST campaign leaflet increases accurate recognition and response in stroke-based scenario measures. Methods: This is a population-based, cross-sectional survey of adults in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, sampled using the electoral register, with individuals randomized to receive a questionnaire and Act FAST leaflet (n = 2500) or a questionnaire only (n = 2500) in 2012. Campaign message retention, stroke recognition, and response measured through 16 scenario-based vignettes were assessed. Data were analyzed in 2013. Results: Questionnaire return rate was 32·3% (n = 1615). No differences were found between the leaflet and no-leaflet groups in return rate or demographics. Participants who received a leaflet showed better campaign recall (75·7% vs. 68·2%, P = 0·003) and recalled more FAST mnemonic elements (66·1% vs. 45·3% elements named correctly, P < 0·001). However, there were no between-group differences for stroke recognition and response to stroke-based scenarios (P > 0·05). Conclusions: Despite greater levels of recall of specific ‘Act FAST' elements among those receiving the Act FAST leaflet, there was no impact on stroke recognition and response measures.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22164
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12353
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. 1 This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Dombrowski SU, White M, Mackintosh JE, Gellert P, Araujo-Soares V, Thomson RG, Rodgers H, Ford GA & Sniehotta FF (2015) The stroke ‘Act FAST’ campaign: Remembered but not understood?, International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), pp. 324-330., which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijs.12353/full. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Affiliation: Psychology
Newcastle University
Newcastle University
Newcastle University
Newcastle University
Newcastle University
Newcastle University
Newcastle University
Newcastle University

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DASH 1 Randomised Evaluation of FAST leaflet paper IJStroke submission_revised_FINAL.pdf550.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.