Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Great apes and biodiversity offset projects in Africa: the case for national offset strategies
Authors: Kormos, Rebecca
Kormos, Cyril
Humle, Tatyana
Lanjouw, Annette
Rainer, Helga
Victurine, Ray
Mittermeier, Russell A
Diallo, Mamadou S
Rylands, Anthony B
Williamson, Elizabeth A
Contact Email:
Issue Date: 5-Nov-2014
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Citation: Kormos R, Kormos C, Humle T, Lanjouw A, Rainer H, Victurine R, Mittermeier RA, Diallo MS, Rylands AB & Williamson EA (2014) Great apes and biodiversity offset projects in Africa: the case for national offset strategies, PLoS ONE, 9 (11), Art. No.: e111671.
Abstract: The development and private sectors are increasingly considering "biodiversity offsets" as a strategy to compensate for their negative impacts on biodiversity, including impacts on great apes and their habitats in Africa. In the absence of national offset policies in sub-Saharan Africa, offset design and implementation are guided by company internal standards, lending bank standards or international best practice principles. We examine four projects in Africa that are seeking to compensate for their negative impacts on great ape populations. Our assessment of these projects reveals that not all apply or implement best practices, and that there is little standardization in the methods used to measure losses and gains in species numbers. Even if they were to follow currently accepted best-practice principles, we find that these actions may still fail to contribute to conservation objectives over the long term. We advocate for an alternative approach in which biodiversity offset and compensation projects are designed and implemented as part of a National Offset Strategy that (1) takes into account the cumulative impacts of development in individual countries, (2) identifies priority offset sites, (3) promotes aggregated offsets, and (4) integrates biodiversity offset and compensation projects with national biodiversity conservation objectives. We also propose supplementary principles necessary for biodiversity offsets to contribute to great ape conservation in Africa. Caution should still be exercised, however, with regard to offsets until further field-based evidence of their effectiveness is available.
Type: Journal Article
DOI Link:
Rights: © 2014 Kormos et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Affiliation: University of California, Berkeley
The Wild Foundation
University of Kent
Arcus Foundation
Arcus Foundation
Wildlife Conservation Society
Conservation International
Guinea Ecology (Guine´e E´cologie)
Conservation International

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kormos et al 2014 Great apes and offsets.pdf459.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.