Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21112
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Reclaiming their lives: The decision-making process in living liver donation - An interpretative phenomenological case study analysis of one couple
Authors: McGregor, Lesley M
Dickson, Adele
Flowers, Paul
Hayes, Peter C
O'Carroll, Ronan
Contact Email: ronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: UK
living liver donation
interpretative phenomenological analysis
decision-making
case study
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Citation: McGregor LM, Dickson A, Flowers P, Hayes PC & O'Carroll R (2014) Reclaiming their lives: The decision-making process in living liver donation - An interpretative phenomenological case study analysis of one couple, Psychology and Health, 29 (12), pp. 1373-1387.
Abstract: Objectives: Adult-to-adult living liver donation (LLD) is a controversial procedure due to the risk to the healthy donor. The decision to proceed with LLD is an important, yet under-researched area. This study aims to explore the decision-making process of the donor and recipient independently, and within the donor-recipient dyad. Design: A longitudinal, qualitative analysis of the LLD decision from the perspective of a LLD donor-recipient dyad. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with the donor and recipient separately on three occasions: pre LLD, six weeks post and six months post LLD. Transcripts were subject to interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results: During the pre-LLD interviews, a series of intra- and interpersonal negotiations were reported as both the donor and recipient grappled to make a decision about LLD. Following the decision, the focus then centred on the consequences of the decision and making sense of unanticipated outcomes. By six months post LLD, both were able to reflect on adapting to the changes their decision had ultimately caused. Conclusions: This case study offers a unique insight into the risk assessment and decision-making demands of LLD and the results can help support future LLD candidates.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21112
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.940950
Rights: © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. Permission is granted subject to the terms of the License under which the work was published. Please check the License conditions for the work which you wish to reuse. Full and appropriate attribution must be given. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Affiliation: University of Stirling
Edinburgh Napier University
Glasgow Caledonian University
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Psychology and Health 2014.pdf197.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.