|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Applying the revenge system to the criminal justice system and jury decision-making|
|Authors:||Roberts, S Craig|
|Publisher:||Cambridge University Press|
|Citation:||Roberts SC & Murray J (2013) Applying the revenge system to the criminal justice system and jury decision-making. [Commentary on: Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness, ME McCullough, R Kurzban, and BA Tabak, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2013), 36, 1, 1-15. ] Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (1), pp. 34-35.|
|Abstract:||McCullough et al. propose an evolved cognitive revenge system which imposes retaliatory costs on aggressors. They distinguish between this and other forms of punishment (e.g., those administered by judges) which are not underpinned by a specifically designed evolutionary mechanism. Here we outline mechanisms and circumstances through which the revenge system might nonetheless infiltrate decision-making within the criminal justice system.|
|Rights:||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences / Volume 36 / Issue 01 / February 2013, pp 34-35 Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013. The original publication is available at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8827728|
|Notes:||Commentary on target article|
|Roberts_Murray_Commentary on McCullough.pdf||312.72 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.