Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/16556
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Title: In defense of the lexical-competition account of picture-word interference: A comment on Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006)
Authors: La, Heij Wido
Kuipers, Jan Rouke
Starreveld, Peter A
Contact Email: janrouke.kuipers@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: language production
lexical access
stroop
picture-word interference
Issue Date: Oct-2006
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: La Heij W, Kuipers JR & Starreveld PA (2006) In defense of the lexical-competition account of picture-word interference: A comment on Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006), Cortex, 42 (7), pp. 1028-1031.
Abstract: On the basis of two empirical observations, Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006) take issue with the generally accepted interpretation of semantic interference in the picture-word interference task in terms of lexical competition. As an alternative, they propose a response-selection account, in which semantic interference is attributed to the time needed to remove the inappropriate (word-reading) response from an output buffer. In this comment we argue that the empirical work discussed provides an interesting challenge for current models of language production, but that the authors' alternative account is at variance with at least three robust empirical findings in the language production literature.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/16556
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70209-0
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Affiliation: Leiden University
Psychology
University of Amsterdam

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
La Heij etal 2006 cortex.pdf74.19 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 31/12/2999     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.