Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10775
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Complexity and context of MHC-correlated mating preferences in wild populations
Authors: Roberts, S Craig
Contact Email: craig.roberts@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: complementary genes
disassortative
genetic diversity
good genes
good-genes-as-heterozygosity
inbreeding
Issue Date: Aug-2009
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Citation: Roberts SC (2009) Complexity and context of MHC-correlated mating preferences in wild populations, Molecular Ecology, 18 (15), pp. 3121-3123.
Abstract: There is now substantial and growing evidence for a role of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in shaping individual mate preferences. In view of both its codominant expression and its function in immune response, it is often expected that females aim to avoid inbreeding or maximize offspring MHC-heterozygosity by selecting as mates those males which share fewest or no MHC alleles with themselves. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that this view is over-simplistic: not only is MHC dissimilarity just one of several (perhaps many) criteria important in mate choice decision-making, extremely MHC-dissimilar males may be avoided, and furthermore, specific alleles or combinations might be preferred if they bestow particular advantages. These points are raised in two papers in this Molecular Ecology issue, in which patterns of reproductive success in tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum) and three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) are each inconsistent with a generalized preference for MHC dissimilarity. Together, these studies demonstrate several adaptive reasons for decision rules that do not necessarily result in maximizing mate dissimilarity.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10775
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04244.x
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Affiliation: Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Roberts_MolEco_2009.pdf198.76 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 31/12/2999     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.