|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Low exercise among children with asthma: a culture of over protection? A qualitative study of experiences and beliefs|
primary health care
|Citation:||Williams B, Hoskins G, Pow J, Neville R, Mukhopadhyay S & Coyle J (2010) Low exercise among children with asthma: a culture of over protection? A qualitative study of experiences and beliefs. British Journal of General Practice, 60 (577), pp. e319-e326. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X515070|
|Abstract:||Background: Research shows that children are insufficiently active in most affluent societies. Although children with asthma may particularly benefit from physical activity, they are less active than their peers. Aim: To explore the reasons for low physical activity levels among children with asthma and to identify strategies to improve activity. Design of study: A qualitative study using in-depth interviews and focus groups. Setting: Six GP practices, a Paediatric Respiratory Unit, and four schools in Tayside, Scotland. Method: Purposive sampling identified 30 children with asthma, their parents (n = 38) and school staff (n = 28), who were interviewed or took part in focus groups. Data were examined using constant comparative analysis. Results: The lower level of activity among children with asthma was supported by a climate of fear among parents and teachers about what was safe and possible for the child. Restrictions were imposed because of perceived dangers of exercising in the presence of 'triggers'. Physical activity was regarded as a threat to be managed rather than something beneficial. Teachers found it difficult to distinguish between children who were physically incapable of exercise due to asthma and those who were unmotivated. GPs were unknowingly drawn into the controversy by children and parents who cite medical advice to sanction exemption from exercise. Conclusion: GPs and asthma nurses need to provide clear management plans explaining what is appropriate and safe in terms of exercise on a child-by-child basis, to counter the considerable misunderstanding and disagreement among children, parents, and teachers.|
|Rights:||Publisher allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in British Journal of General Practice, 60(577): pp.e319-e326, 08/2010 by Royal College of General Practitioners.|
|WilliamsEtal_BJGP_2010.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||149.62 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.