Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/9857
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoxburgh, Michelleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorConlon, Margareten_UK
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Debbieen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-10T22:12:11Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-10T22:12:11Z-
dc.date.issued2012-10en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/9857-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Most of UK students' practice learning experience is based on a rotational placement model which often leads to students lacking confidence and feeling anxious about the complexities of the care environment. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of Hub and Spoke model(s) of clinical practice placement across geographically diverse locations, with a particular focus on enhancing the student practice learning experience. Design: Multiple case study design. Setting & Participants: Comprised undergraduate student nurses from Adult, Learning Disability and Mental Health programmes from 3 Scottish Schools of Nursing. Methods: A mixed methods approach which included quantitative and qualitative date tools. Results: All three Hub and Spoke models shared two broad findings: 1) which supports the process with opportunities for individual students to be positively innovative and creative in their learning approaches. Depth of learning was achieved in two ways; a) the method in which Hub placements are organised, managed and structured and, b) the depth of empathy and sensitivity to the individual at the centre of the care.In the three Hub and Spoke models detailed in this paper, there is a continuum of student led learning 2) Engagement of mentors/enhanced student/mentor relationship.Placement capacity is increased: The classification of placements is reviewed to produce broader categories, Conclusions: Practice Learning must be seen as an academic endeavour that promotes deep, meaningful, person-centred learning rather than superficial, compartmentalised placement-centred learning.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier for Churchill Livingstoneen_UK
dc.relationRoxburgh M, Conlon M & Banks D (2012) Evaluating Hub and Spoke Models of Practice learning in Scotland, UK: A multiple Case Study Approach. Nurse Education Today, 32 (7), pp. 782-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.004en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectPractice Learningen_UK
dc.subjectBelongingnessen_UK
dc.subjectLearning environmentsen_UK
dc.subjectNurse trainingen_UK
dc.titleEvaluating Hub and Spoke Models of Practice learning in Scotland, UK: A multiple Case Study Approachen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Hub and spoke case study.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.004en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid22683178en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNurse Education Todayen_UK
dc.citation.issn0260-6917en_UK
dc.citation.volume32en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.spage782en_UK
dc.citation.epage789en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailmichelle.roxburgh@uhi.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRobert Gordon Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000308680800012en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84864507623en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid749821en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9387-1881en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-10-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-10-31en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoxburgh, Michelle|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorConlon, Margaret|0000-0001-9387-1881en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBanks, Debbie|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHub and spoke case study.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0260-6917en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hub and spoke case study.pdfFulltext - Published Version562.39 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.