Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/9830
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRushmer, Rosemaryen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThemessl-Huber, Markusen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCoyle, Joanneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHumphris, Gerryen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDowell, Jonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Brianen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-22T23:15:47Z-
dc.date.available2015-10-22T23:15:47Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2011-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/9830-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To explore stakeholders' attitudes towards routine, longitudinal recording of primary care consultations for research purposes, and to identify legal, ethical, and practical barriers and facilitators. Methods: 183 stakeholders (including patients, researchers and practice staff) were identified using a purposeful sampling strategy. Stakeholders participated in focus groups and interviews. The data was analysed thematically in an iterative manner with themes and questions from earlier discussions being raised with later participants. Results: Most participants supported the creation of a database and believed it would benefit patient care. They suggested it could be used to train doctors, aid understanding of conditions, and feed information back to practices to improve performance. However, enthusiasm was tempered by concerns about the ownership security and access of the data; quality and limitations of the dataset; impact on behaviour; and workload. Safeguards were suggested that protected vulnerable individuals, enabled participation, gave control to participants, and clarified data use. Conclusion: The findings show that collecting such longitudinal data is possible, valuable and acceptable providing certain safeguards are in place. Practice implications: Future studies employing routine recordings of consultations should: Attend to confidentiality, access and governance of the archive. Collect quality data, and store it securely.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier for the American Academy on Communication in Healthcare (AACH) and the European Association for Communication in Healthcare (EACH)en_UK
dc.relationRushmer R, Themessl-Huber M, Coyle J, Humphris G, Dowell J & Williams B (2011) Is the routine recording of primary care consultations possible … and desirable? Lessons for researchers from a consultation with multiple stakeholders. Patient Education and Counseling, 82 (2), pp. 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.020en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectPrimary careen_UK
dc.subjectConsultation studyen_UK
dc.subjectGP–patient consultationsen_UK
dc.subjectAudio-recordingen_UK
dc.subjectLongitudinal data linkageen_UK
dc.titleIs the routine recording of primary care consultations possible … and desirable? Lessons for researchers from a consultation with multiple stakeholdersen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-29en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Williams_2011_Is_the_routine_recording_of_primary_care.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.020en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid20547028en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePatient Education and Counselingen_UK
dc.citation.issn0738-3991en_UK
dc.citation.volume82en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage247en_UK
dc.citation.epage253en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailbrian.williams@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000287467800018en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-78651511001en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid758649en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0000-4354en_UK
dc.date.accepted2010-04-22en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-04-22en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-10-25en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRushmer, Rosemary|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThemessl-Huber, Markus|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCoyle, Joanne|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHumphris, Gerry|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDowell, Jon|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilliams, Brian|0000-0003-0000-4354en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameWilliams_2011_Is_the_routine_recording_of_primary_care.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0738-3991en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Williams_2011_Is_the_routine_recording_of_primary_care.pdfFulltext - Published Version134.09 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-29    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.