|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||A theoretical framework and research agenda for studying team attributions in sport|
|Author(s):||Allen, Mark S|
|Citation:||Allen MS, Coffee P & Greenlees I (2012) A theoretical framework and research agenda for studying team attributions in sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5 (2), pp. 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2012.663400|
|Abstract:||The attributions made for group outcomes have attracted a great deal of interest in recent years. In this article we bring together much of the current research on attribution theory in sport and outline a new conceptual framework and research agenda for investigating the attributions of team members. The proposed framework draws on multiple conceptual approaches including models of attribution, group dynamics and stress responses to provide a detailed hypothetical description of athletes' physiological, cognitive and affective responses to group competition. In describing this model we outline important antecedents of team attributions before hypothesising how attributions can impact hormonal and cardiovascular responses of athletes, together with cognitive (goals, choices, expectations), affective (self-esteem, emotions), and behavioural (approach-avoidance actions) responses of groups and group members. We conclude by outlining important methodological considerations and implications for structured context specific attribution-based interventions.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2012, pp.121-144, copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1750984X.2012.663400|
|Allen et al. (2012).pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||277.32 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.