Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/9020
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLogie-MacIver, Lizen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPiacentini, Mariaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEadie, Douglasen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-10T08:26:54Z-
dc.date.available2015-02-10T08:26:54Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2012en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/9020-
dc.description.abstractPurpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the use of qualitative approaches to add depth and insight to understanding concerning the issues involved when consumers try to make changes in their behaviour. The context of this study is people trying to make and sustain changes to their dietary behaviour. Taking Prochaska and Di Clemente’s Stages of Change model as the starting point, this paper marks a departure from other work in the behavioural change area in so far as a qualitative approach is adopted rather than a quantitative perspective. Design/methodology/approach – This study was longitudinal in design and the data presented concern groups of people who were categorized as belonging to stages of change and who followed a similar stage of change pattern over a period of 18 months (according to the Stage of Change algorithm described by Curry et al.). Findings– By examining peoples’ behaviour changes in depth, the similarities and differences in  their attitudes and motivations are revealed in terms of their dietary behaviour change and maintenance of change. This provides a more refined understanding of how people make changes and maintain them over time. Research limitations/implications – While focusing only on a small number of people, the  weaknesses of the Stages of Change model is demonstrated and how qualitative research approaches can be used to add depth and meaning to quantitative methodologies popular in the social marketing domain. Originality/value – This paper demonstrates that the Stages of Change model has value in categorizing people into stages of change and measuring these changes over time but is limited in its ability to develop understanding of the lived experience of trying to change behaviour.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEmeralden_UK
dc.relationLogie-MacIver L, Piacentini M & Eadie D (2012) Using qualitative methodologies to understand behaviour change. Qualitative Market Research, 15 (1), pp. 70-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751211192008en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_UK
dc.subjectConsumer behaviouren_UK
dc.subjectDieten_UK
dc.subjectBehaviour modificationen_UK
dc.subjectBehaviour changeen_UK
dc.subjectMaintenance of changeen_UK
dc.subjectSocial marketingen_UK
dc.titleUsing qualitative methodologies to understand behaviour changeen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-12-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[QMR paper PUBLISHED JAN2012.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/13522751211192008en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleQualitative Market Research: An International Journalen_UK
dc.citation.issn1352-2752en_UK
dc.citation.volume15en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage70en_UK
dc.citation.epage86en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaildouglas.eadie@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdinburgh Napier Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLancaster Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84155189700en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid770652en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-09-10en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorLogie-MacIver, Liz|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPiacentini, Maria|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEadie, Douglas|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-12-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameQMR paper PUBLISHED JAN2012.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1352-2752en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
QMR paper PUBLISHED JAN2012.pdfFulltext - Published Version101.09 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-12-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.