Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The Equality of Lotteries
Author(s): Saunders, Ben
Contact Email:
Issue Date: Jul-2008
Date Deposited: 22-Aug-2012
Citation: Saunders B (2008) The Equality of Lotteries. Philosophy, 83 (3), pp. 359-372.;
Abstract: Lotteries have long been used to resolve competing claims, yet their recent implementation to allocate school places in Brighton and Hove, England led to considerable public outcry. This article argues that, given appropriate selection is impossible when parties have equal claims, a lottery is preferable to an auction because it excludes unjust influences. Three forms of contractualism are discussed and the fairness of lotteries is traced to the fact that they give each person an equal chance, as a surrogate for their equal claim to the good. It is argued that this can be a reason to favour an artificially-constructed lottery to a 'natural' lottery where there is suspicion that the latter may be biased.
DOI Link: 10.1017/S0031819108000727
Rights: Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Philosophy by Cambridge University Press and The Royal Institute of Philosophy, copyright 2008. Philosophy / Volume 83 / Issue 03 / July 2008 , pp 359-372; DOI:

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
displayFulltext.pdfFulltext - Published Version93.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.