Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7521
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Benen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-18T12:21:22Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-18T12:21:22Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2011-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7521-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: The qualitative hedonism advanced by John Stuart Mill has been subject to much controversy. Jonathan Riley has offered an interpretation certain aspects of which have become standard orthodoxy. In a recent discussion, Christoph Schmidt-Petrihas challenged several features of Riley's interpretation and Riley has responded to his criticisms. Both interpretations have merit, but neither wholly fits Mill's text.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringeren_UK
dc.relationSaunders B (2011) Reinterpreting the Qualitative Hedonism Advanced by J.S. Mill. Journal of Value Inquiry, 45 (2), pp. 187-201. http://www.springerlink.com/content/rg55g75804275882/?MUD=MP; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-011-9274-0en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleReinterpreting the Qualitative Hedonism Advanced by J.S. Millen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[fulltext.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10790-011-9274-0en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Value Inquiryen_UK
dc.citation.issn1573-0492en_UK
dc.citation.issn0022-5363en_UK
dc.citation.volume45en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage187en_UK
dc.citation.epage201en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.springerlink.com/content/rg55g75804275882/?MUD=MPen_UK
dc.author.emailben.saunders@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000294691200007en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-80052342917en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid783952en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-05-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-22en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSaunders, Ben|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamefulltext.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0022-5363en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdfFulltext - Published Version149.92 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.