1. STORRE
  2. Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport
  3. Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/748
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVamplew, Wrayen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-17T23:11:48Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-17T23:11:48Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/748-
dc.description.abstractThis paper makes a further contribution to the debate in this journal between Tony Collins and disciples of the theory of the ‘civilizing process’, but this time with reference solely to cricket, a sport ignored by Graham Curry, Eric Dunning and Kenneth Sheard in their reply to Collins.[2] Moreover, whereas Collins focuses his criticisms on the historical method and the associated problems of hindsight, progress and perspective, this paper will concentrate on the use of historical evidence.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_UK
dc.relationVamplew W (2007) Empiricist versus sociological history: some comments on the ‘civilizing process’. Sport in History, 27 (2), pp. 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460260701436997en_UK
dc.rightsPublished by Taylor & Francisen_UK
dc.subjectEmpiricisten_UK
dc.subjectSociological Historyen_UK
dc.subjectCricket Social aspectsen_UK
dc.subjectViolence in sportsen_UK
dc.subjectSpectator controlen_UK
dc.titleEmpiricist versus sociological history: some comments on the ‘civilizing process’en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2009-02-05en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Empiricist Versus Sociological History.pdf] Publisher requires 18 month embargo after publicationen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17460260701436997en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleSport in Historyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1746-0271en_UK
dc.citation.issn1746-0263en_UK
dc.citation.volume27en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage161en_UK
dc.citation.epage171en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailwray.vamplew@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date10/09/2007en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85011146070en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid804769en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-09-10en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2009-02-05en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorVamplew, Wray|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2009-02-05en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2009-02-05|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameEmpiricist Versus Sociological History.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1746-0263en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Empiricist Versus Sociological History.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version70.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright

View License
Show simple item record


Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.