|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections|
|Title:||Disjunctivism and skepticism|
|Citation:||Millar A (2008) Disjunctivism and skepticism. In: Greco John (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford Handbooks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 581-604.|
|Series/Report no.:||Oxford Handbooks|
|Abstract:||The paper explains what disjunctivism is and explores its implications for skepticism. Following an account of Paul Snowdon’s conception of a disjunctivist account of perceptual experience the the focus is on how disjunctivism has figured in the epistemological work of John McDowell. A conception of recognitional abilities is deployed to expand on McDowell’s position. Finally, there is consideration of whether McDowell offers a satisfactory response to skepticism, taking account of criticism’s made by Crispin Wright.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository (or has not responded to our queries). Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. OUP are currently reviewing their open access policy, and if there policy changes the current embargo will be lifted.|
|Disjunctivism and Skepticism.pdf||173.89 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.