Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections|
|Title:||Continuity in Question: An afterword to 'Is Language the Ultimate Artefact?'|
|Citation:||Wheeler M (2007) Continuity in Question: An afterword to 'Is Language the Ultimate Artefact?'. In: Wallace B, Ross A, Davies J & Anderson T (eds.) The Mind, the Body and the World: Psychology After Cognitivism?. Exeter: Imprint Academic, pp. 298-306. http://www.booksonix.com/imprint/bookshop/|
|Abstract:||Is Language the Ultimate Artefact? (henceforth ILUA) was originally published alongside a paper by Andy Clark called Is Language Special? Some remarks on control, coding, and co-ordination (Clark 2004). One concern (among others) of the latter paper was to resist the argument of the former. In this short afterword, I shall attempt a counterresponse to Clark’s resistance. In so doing I hope to reveal, in a new and perhaps clearer way, what the most important issues really are in this (still unresolved) debate.|
|Rights:||The publisher has granted permission for use of this item in this repository. The item was first published by Imprint Academic.|
Files in This Item:
|Wheeler_is_language_afterword_STORRE.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||43.23 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.