School of Arts and Humanities >
Law and Philosophy >
Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections|
|Title: ||Continuity in Question: An afterword to 'Is Language the Ultimate Artefact?'|
|Author(s): ||Wheeler, Michael|
|Contact Email: ||firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Editor(s): ||Wallace, B|
|Citation: ||Wheeler M (2007) Continuity in Question: An afterword to 'Is Language the Ultimate Artefact?'. In: Wallace B, Ross A, Davies JB, Anderson T (ed.). The Mind, the Body and the World: Psychology After Cognitivism?, Exeter: Imprint Academic, pp. 298-306.|
|Issue Date: ||2007|
|Publisher: ||Imprint Academic|
|Abstract: ||Is Language the Ultimate Artefact? (henceforth ILUA) was originally published alongside a paper by Andy Clark called Is Language Special? Some remarks on control, coding, and co-ordination (Clark 2004). One concern (among others) of the latter paper was to resist the argument of the former. In this short afterword, I shall attempt a counterresponse to Clark’s resistance. In so doing I hope to reveal, in a new and perhaps clearer way, what the most important issues really are in this (still unresolved) debate.|
|Rights: ||The publisher has granted permission for use of this item in this repository. The item was first published by Imprint Academic.|
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.