Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status: ||Refereed|
|Title: ||The Unity of a Tractarian Fact|
|Author(s): ||Johnston, Colin|
|Contact Email: ||firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Issue Date: ||May-2007|
|Date Deposited: ||12-Dec-2008|
|Citation: ||Johnston C (2007) The Unity of a Tractarian Fact. Synthese, 156 (2), pp. 231-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-0002-4|
|Abstract: ||It is not immediately clear from Wittgenstein’s Tractatus how to connect his idea there of an ‘object’ with the logical ontologies of Frege and Russell. Toward clarification on this matter, this paper compares Russell’s and Wittgenstein’s versions of the thesis of an atomic fact that it is a complex composition. The claim arrived at is that whilst Russell (at times at least) has one particular of the elements of a fact – the relation – responsible for the unity of the whole, for Wittgenstein the unity of a fact is the product of copulative powers inherent in all its elements. All kinds of constituents of Tractarian facts – all kinds (forms) of object – are, to use Fregean terminology, unsaturated.|
|DOI Link: ||10.1007/s11229-006-0002-4|
|Rights: ||Published in Synthese by Springer Verlag. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com|
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.