|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Developing diversity through specialisation in secondary education: comparing approaches in New Zealand and England|
|Keywords:||Education, Secondary Curricula England|
Education, Secondary Curricula New Zealand
Curriculum planning England
Curriculum planning New Zealand
|Citation:||Higham J, Sharp P & Priestley M (2000) Developing diversity through specialisation in secondary education: comparing approaches in New Zealand and England. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 30 (2), pp. 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/713657461|
|Abstract:||The paper compares approaches to curriculum specialisation in secondary education in New Zealand and England. In both countries there have been movements towards increased specialisation, though these have been quite different in form and scope. In both countries specialisation cannot be divorced from broader education policies designed to increase devolution and choice and the paper discusses these contexts before analysing the different approaches to specialisation and attempting an explanation. The authors of the paper draw on findings from research undertaken in New Zealand schools. The paper identifies three dimensions that have played a part in influencing curriculum specialisation in both countries. These are opportunity, source of impetus and support. It is argued that while local initiative is possible in New Zealand, central planning and guidance is inadequate. In England while central planning is strong and support is available, it is far from clear that real specialisation is encouraged by existing curriculum and assessment frameworks. In these circumstances in both countries it seems likely that vertical, rather than horizontal, diversity will continue to hold sway.|
|Rights:||Published in Compare by Taylor & Francis (Routledge)|
|NZ_specschools.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||78.8 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.