Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/396
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPriestley, Marken_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-24T23:50:29Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-24T23:50:29Z-
dc.date.issued2003-07en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/396-
dc.description.abstractCurriculum 2000 was heralded as a long overdue reform of the post-sixteen curriculum in England. In particular, critics of the traditional A level school curriculum had long complained of the narrow focus of these qualifications. The initiative therefore sought to improve the breadth of study experienced by students, through the added inclusion of Key Skills to the curriculum and the institution of an additional tier of assessment in Year 12; this latter reform would, it was hoped, allow students to follow broader courses of study in Year 12 before specialising in Year 13. Curriculum 2000 also sought to bring together the academic and vocational tracks, through encouraging mix-and-match qualifications. In practice its first two years have been characterised by implementation problems, as examination boards, schools, teachers and students have struggled to come to terms with the new system. Recently these problems have received the full glare of publicity, contributing to a ministerial resignation, as the media has spotlighted the grading crisis of 2002. This paper examines the policy context of the reform before drawing on research findings to address a particular issue of relevance: whether Curriculum 2000 succeeds in its stated aim of increasing breadth of study.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_UK
dc.relationPriestley M (2003) Curriculum 2000: a broader view. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33 (2), pp. 237-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640302037en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Cambridge Journal of Education by Taylor & Francisen_UK
dc.subjectCurriculumen_UK
dc.subjectCurriculum planning Great Britainen_UK
dc.subjectCurriculum evaluation Great Britainen_UK
dc.subjectEducation, Secondary Great Britain Curriculaen_UK
dc.subjectVocational education Great Britainen_UK
dc.titleCurriculum 2000: a broader viewen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03057640302037en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleCambridge Journal of Educationen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-3577en_UK
dc.citation.issn0305-764Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume33en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage237en_UK
dc.citation.epage255en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailm.r.priestley@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInitial Teacher Education - LEGACYen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid826796en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8276-7771en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2003-07-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2008-06-13en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPriestley, Mark|0000-0001-8276-7771en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2008-06-13en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2008-06-13|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCurriculum2000draft.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0305-764Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Curriculum2000draft.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version105.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.