Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38425
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Smelling Salts or Smoke and Mirrors? Acute Ammonia Inhalation, Arousal, and Physical Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Author(s): Liu, Shenghui
Fan, Xiaohan
Tan, Zhiyuan
Gu, Jinfa
Huang, Qing
Li, Hansen
Macgregor, Lewis J
Deng, Hengzhi
Contact Email: l.j.macgregor1@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: ammonia inhalants
smelling salts
physical performance
arousal
exercise performance
Issue Date: 10-Aug-2026
Date Deposited: 30-Oct-2026
Citation: Liu S, Fan X, Tan Z, Gu J, Huang Q, Li H, Macgregor LJ & Deng H (2026) Smelling Salts or Smoke and Mirrors? Acute Ammonia Inhalation, Arousal, and Physical Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. <i>Brain Sciences</i>, 16 (8). 10.3390/brainsci16080849; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16080849
Abstract: Background/Objectives: Ammonia inhalants, commonly known as smelling salts, are widely used in sport as an acute arousal strategy, yet their ergogenic value remains uncertain. This systematic review and three-level meta-analysis examined the acute effects of ammonia inhalation on physical performance and selected psychophysiological outcomes. Methods: Controlled human studies involving healthy adults, physically active individuals, or athletes were included when they compared ammonia inhalation with placebo, sham, or no-inhalation control conditions. Physical performance was the primary outcome, with heart rate and selected subjective responses analyzed as exploratory secondary outcomes. Results: Ten studies were included. The primary analysis showed no statistically significant effect of ammonia inhalation on overall physical performance (k = 47, g = 0.11, 95% CI [−0.06, 0.28]). Heart rate and subjective exertion/fatigue were also not significantly affected. In contrast, subjective activation/arousal increased significantly (k = 9, g = 0.73, 95% CI [0.43, 1.04]), although this finding was based on only two studies. Moderator analyses did not show consistent subgroup differences for performance type, training status, or comparator type, whereas sex-based differences were exploratory and based on limited evidence. Sensitivity analyses suggested that physical performance became significantly improved after removal of influential effects, and power/explosive performance showed a possible benefit; however, these findings should be considered preliminary rather than confirmatory. Conclusions: Overall, ammonia inhalation appears to act primarily as a brief arousal stimulus rather than a consistent ergogenic aid. Potential benefits may depend on task demands, with explosive or repeated high-intensity tasks appearing more plausible targets than maximal strength or precision-based skills. Current evidence remains limited by small samples, heterogeneous protocols, and low certainty.
URL: 10.3390/brainsci16080849
DOI Link: 10.3390/brainsci16080849
Rights: All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. This means the following: Everyone has free and unlimited access to the full texts of all articles published in MDPI journals; Everyone is free to reuse the published material if the original article is properly accredited and cited; Open access publication is supported by the authors' institutes or research funding agencies via the payment of a comparatively low Article Processing Charge (APC) for accepted articles.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
brainsci-16-00849-v3.pdfFulltext - Published Version4.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.