Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38364
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNicholls, Jamesen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJones, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMaynard, Oliviaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAskew, Rebeccaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Catharineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHolland, Adamen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSumnall, Harryen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-07T00:04:54Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-07T00:04:54Z-
dc.date.issued2026-09-28en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/38364-
dc.description.abstractThe provision of supervised drug consumption facilities (SDCF) is a recent development in the United Kingdom (UK). The only currently operating facility opened in Glasgow in 2025. It has attracted extensive media and political scrutiny, often framed in moral terms. This experimental vignette study examined the role of moral judgements in UK debates on SDCF provision through the lens of Moral Foundations Theory (MFT). We undertook a cross-sectional online experimental study with a randomised factorial design. Participants (N=1,506; 52% female; mean age 47±16 years) were randomly assigned one of seven short vignettes. Six made an argument in favour of SDCF provision, framed around one of the six moral foundations identified in the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, Version 2 (MFQ-2). One provided a neutral description of SDCFs. Participants then answered two questions on support for SDCF provision either (a) in the UK or (b) in their local area. Across all groups, support for SDCF provision somewhere in the UK was broadly positive. However, exposure to different message frames was not associated with differences in level of support. In contrast, only participants exposed to the care/harm framing vignette showed support for an SDCF in their own neighbourhood. Furthermore, MFQ-2 scores showed only limited associations with support: specifically, orientation towards the care/harm foundation predicted greater support for local provision. Our findings suggest that moral framing may have limited persuasive effect when policy proposals are hypothetical or abstract, but that some types of moral considerations may become more salient as interventions are concretised in local contexts. The findings raise questions about the extent to which MFQ scores predict opinions on specific drug policy issues and invite further research on the role of emotional salience in shaping public responses to drug policy proposals.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_UK
dc.relationNicholls J, Jones A, Maynard O, Askew R, Montgomery C, Holland A & Sumnall H (2026) Does ‘Moral Reframing’ Impact Support for Supervised Drug Consumption Facilities in the UK? An Experimental Vignette Study. <i>Contemporary Drug Problems</i>. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914509261488595en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectharm reductionen_UK
dc.subjectdrug policyen_UK
dc.subjectsafer drug consumption facilitiesen_UK
dc.subjectmoral foundations theoryen_UK
dc.subjectmoralityen_UK
dc.titleDoes ‘Moral Reframing’ Impact Support for Supervised Drug Consumption Facilities in the UK? An Experimental Vignette Studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00914509261488595en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleContemporary Drug Problemsen_UK
dc.citation.issn2163-1808en_UK
dc.citation.issn0091-4509en_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderLiverpool John Moores Universityen_UK
dc.author.emailj.c.nicholls@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date28/09/2026en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketing & Public Healthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLiverpool John Moores Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bristolen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationManchester Metropolitan Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLiverpool John Moores Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bristolen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLiverpool John Moores Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001887533700001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid105051972734en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2302908en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4638-1972en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6281-227Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3617-1966en_UK
dc.date.accepted2026-08-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-08-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2026-09-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcunknownen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorNicholls, James|0000-0003-4638-1972en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJones, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMaynard, Olivia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAskew, Rebecca|0000-0002-6281-227Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMontgomery, Catharine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHolland, Adam|0000-0002-3617-1966en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSumnall, Harry|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Liverpool John Moores University|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2026-10-05en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2026-10-05|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameNicholls et al - Moral reframing and SDCF support 9-26.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2163-1808en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Nicholls et al - Moral reframing and SDCF support 9-26.pdfFulltext - Published Version887.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.