Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38334Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Li, Saihong | - |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Benwell, Bethan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Shaona | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-09-18T13:19:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-09-18T13:19:27Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38334 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines how Virginia Woolf’s feminist discourse has been translated, reframed, and ideologically negotiated within the Chinese context across different historical periods. Woolf’s narrative technique, especially the use of free indirect discourse, challenges established gender norms, making these four works—Mrs. Dalloway (1925), To the Lighthouse (1927), Orlando: A Biography (1928), and A Room of One’s Own (1929)— exemplary texts for analysing gender representation in literature and society. Focusing on gender representation, linguistic transformation, and cultural adaptation, this study explores how Chinese translators have addressed Woolf’s complex feminist discourses and evolving constructions of gender, identity, and power. Based on Catford’s theory of "translation shifts" (1965) and Toury’s idea of "optional shifts" (1995), the research assesses how feminist roles and expectations are conveyed to Chinese audiences through these translations. A mixed-method approach is utilised, combining a self-constructed diachronic corpus with detailed textual analysis and content coding using NVivo and WordSmith 6 to examine the linguistic, cultural, and historical variations in Chinese translations. This study uncovers two main findings. First, it challenges the common belief that early Chinese translations of Virginia Woolf’s works were uniformly conservative. Instead, it shows that some early translators actively engaged with Woolf’s feminist ideas, sometimes even emphasising them despite prevailing historical and ideological limitations. Second, the analysis reveals a pattern where co-translated works tend to prioritise fidelity, and sometimes even amplify feminist ideas, whereas individual female translators are more inclined to employ interpretive strategies that emphasise gender critique. Conversely, male translators frequently downplay or domesticate feminist elements. These findings suggest that translator identity and the structure of collaboration significantly influence ideological positioning, regardless of the historical period. This research contributes to feminist translation theory and Woolf scholarship by highlighting the significance of translator agency and collaboration in shaping feminist discourse through translation. | en_GB |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | University of Stirling | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Virginia Woolf | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Translation shift theory | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Corpus-based method | en_GB |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Woolf, Virginia, 1882-1941 | en_GB |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Woolf, Virginia, 1882-1941 Criticism and interpretation | en_GB |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Woolf, Virginia, 1882-1941 Mrs Dalloway | en_GB |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Woolf, Virginia, 1882-1941 To the lighthouse | en_GB |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Woolf, Virginia, 1882-1941 Orlando | en_GB |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Woolf, Virginia, 1882-1941 Room of one's own | en_GB |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Feminism and literature | en_GB |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Linguistics | en_GB |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Translating and interpreting | en_GB |
| dc.title | Translating Virginia Woolf's feminist perspectives in the 20th and 21st century | en_GB |
| dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en_GB |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_GB |
| dc.type.qualificationname | Doctor of Philosophy | en_GB |
| dc.author.email | lina15833611555@gmail.com | en_GB |
| Appears in Collections: | Literature and Languages eTheses | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shaona's thesis 2025 .pdf | 2.91 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.
