Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38005
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMunthe‐Kaas, Heather Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSommer, Isoldeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Saraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGarside, Ruthen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHannes, Karinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNoyes, Janeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThe CAMELOT Development Group,en_UK
dc.contributor.otherFrance, Emmaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-07T00:07:08Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-07T00:07:08Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06en_UK
dc.identifier.othere12058en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/38005-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Qualitative evidence is increasingly incorporated into decision-making processes. Assessing the methodological limitations of primary studies is critical to making an overall assessment of confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (QES) using GRADE-CERQual. Current critical appraisal tools were not developed specifically for use in Cochrane reviews or GRADE-CERQual, and few are evidence-based. The aim of CochrAne qualitative Methodological LimitatiOns Tool (CAMELOT) was to address this gap. Methods We undertook this project in four stages: (1) systematic literature search to identify existing tools, (2) identification of evidence to support inclusion of potential CAMELOT domains (3) consensus survey to agree on the inclusion and definition of CAMELOT domains, and (4) human-centered design approach to develop and refine CAMELOT by exploring user experience. Results CAMELOT is a new evidence-based tool for assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of primary qualitative research studies in a QES. CAMELOT is comprised of 12 domains: four Meta domains that encourage review authors to consider those characteristics of the primary study that are beyond how the study was carried out, but which inform the conduct and design of the study, and eight Method domains which encourage review authors to consider how the study was designed, planned and/or conducted, and how study conduct and design fits with the information provided in the four meta domains. Review authors make an assessment by identifying any concerns regarding the methods used in the study and considering the appropriateness of fit between the Meta and Method domains. Conclusion CAMELOT provides review authors with a transparent and systematic method to assess methodological limitations of primary qualitative studies. CAMELOT incorporates qualitative principles and focuses on appropriateness of fit between Meta and Method domains. In line with iterative tool development approach, CAMELOT will continue to be revised over time following extensive user testing and piloting.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationMunthe‐Kaas HM, Booth A, Sommer I, Cooper S, Garside R, Hannes K, Noyes J & The CAMELOT Development Group (2024) Developing CAMELOT for assessing methodological limitations of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative evidence syntheses. France E (Research Group) <i>Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods</i>, 2 (6), Art. No.: e12058. https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12058en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectconsensus developmenten_UK
dc.subjectcritical appraisalen_UK
dc.subjectDelphien_UK
dc.subjectGRADE-CERQualen_UK
dc.subjectmetodological limitationsen_UK
dc.subjectqualitative evidence synthesisen_UK
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_UK
dc.titleDeveloping CAMELOT for assessing methodological limitations of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative evidence synthesesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cesm.12058en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid40475879en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleCochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methodsen_UK
dc.citation.issn2832-9023en_UK
dc.citation.issn2832-9023en_UK
dc.citation.volume2en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailsam.dixon@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date08/06/2024en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNorwegian Institute of Public Healthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sheffielden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDanube University Kremsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSouth African Medical Research Centreen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Exeteren_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKU Leuvenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationIndependenten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Stirlingen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2038099en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6051-9010en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4808-3880en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3592-1507en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9627-0309en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1649-4773en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5011-3615en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4238-5984en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0876-7030en_UK
dc.date.accepted2024-04-17en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-04-17en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2026-04-30en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMunthe‐Kaas, Heather M|0000-0002-6051-9010en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBooth, Andrew|0000-0003-4808-3880en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSommer, Isolde|0000-0003-3592-1507en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCooper, Sara|0000-0002-9627-0309en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGarside, Ruth|0000-0003-1649-4773en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHannes, Karin|0000-0002-5011-3615en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNoyes, Jane|0000-0003-4238-5984en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThe CAMELOT Development Group, |en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2026-04-30en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2026-04-30|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods - 2024 - Munthe___Kaas - Developing CAMELOT for assessing methodological limitations.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2832-9023en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods - 2024 - Munthe___Kaas - Developing CAMELOT for assessing methodological limitations.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.