Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37831
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoca-Royes, Soniaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-28T01:07:47Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-28T01:07:47Z-
dc.date.issued2025-11-25en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/37831-
dc.description.abstractThe paper discusses Jessica Leech’s Modal Transcendentalism. In particular, it engages critically with the claim that her Objective Necessity, of Kantian inspiration, in being the strictest real necessity, earns the title of Metaphysical Necessity. I argue that a Neo-Aristotelian Modality better deserves that title, but that this discussion is ultimately a distraction, with the danger of making us see these two modalities as competitors of one another. They are not, and the theoretical benefits afforded by endorsing them both are to be explored.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherInforma UK Limiteden_UK
dc.relationRoca-Royes S (2025) Kantian Modality vis-à-vis Neo-Aristotelian Modality. <i>Inquiry</i>. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2025.2590053en_UK
dc.rights© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectObjective modalityen_UK
dc.subjectNeo-Aristotlelian Modalityen_UK
dc.subjectKantian modalityen_UK
dc.subjectmodal transcendentalismen_UK
dc.titleKantian Modality vis-à-vis Neo-Aristotelian Modalityen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0020174x.2025.2590053en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInquiryen_UK
dc.citation.issn1502-3923en_UK
dc.citation.issn0020-174Xen_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.author.emailsonia.rocaroyes@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date25/11/2025en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001623508300001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid105023277085en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2221045en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6101-3353en_UK
dc.date.accepted2025-11-11en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-11-11en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2025-12-20en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoca-Royes, Sonia|0000-0002-6101-3353en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University of Stirling|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2026-01-27en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2026-01-27|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameKantian Modality vis- -vis Neo-Aristotelian Modality.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1502-3923en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kantian Modality vis- -vis Neo-Aristotelian Modality.pdfFulltext - Published Version772.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.