Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37777
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBosó Pérez, Raquelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorReid, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, Karen Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, Joen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDema, Emilyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBonell, Christopheren_UK
dc.contributor.authorMercer, Catherine Hen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSonnenberg, Pamen_UK
dc.contributor.authorField, Nigelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Kirstin Ren_UK
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T01:09:10Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-24T01:09:10Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/37777-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Access to quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services remains imperative even during a pandemic. Our objective was to understand experiences of delayed or unsuccessful access to SRH services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In October and November 2020 we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 14 women and six men reporting an unmet need for SRH services in the Natsal-COVID survey, a large-scale quasi-representative web-panel survey of sexual health and behaviour during COVID-19 (n=6654). We purposively sampled eligible participants using sociodemographic quotas. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore service access and quality and to identify lessons for future SRH service delivery. Results: Twenty participants discussed experiences spanning 10 SRH services including contraception and antenatal/maternity care. Participants reported hesitancy and self-censorship of need. Accessing telemedicine and ‘socially-distanced’ services required tenacity. Challenges included navigating changing information and procedures; perceptions of gatekeepers as obstructing access; and inflexible appointment systems. Concerns about reconfigured services included reduced privacy; decreased quality of interactions with professionals; reduced informal support; and fewer preventive SRH practices. However, some participants also described more streamlined services and staff efforts to compensate for disruptions. Many viewed positively the ongoing blending of telemedicine with in-person care. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted access and quality of SRH services. Participants’ accounts revealed self-censorship of need, difficulty navigating shifting service configurations and perceived quality reductions. Telemedicine offers potential if intelligently combined with in-person care. We offer initial evidence-based recommendations for promoting an equitable restoration and future adaption of services.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJen_UK
dc.relationBosó Pérez R, Reid D, Maxwell KJ, Gibbs J, Dema E, Bonell C, Mercer CH, Sonnenberg P, Field N & Mitchell KR (2023) Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences. <i>BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health</i>, 49, pp. 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201413en_UK
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleAccess to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiencesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201413en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid35444001en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Sexual & Reproductive Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn2515-2009en_UK
dc.citation.issn2515-1991en_UK
dc.citation.volume49en_UK
dc.citation.spage12en_UK
dc.citation.epage20en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.funderChief Scientist Officeen_UK
dc.contributor.funderThe Wellcome Trusten_UK
dc.author.emailk.j.maxwell@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date20/04/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicineen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000784603900001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid85130901321en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2216338en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7342-4566en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2264-6510en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6253-6498en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-04-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-04-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2025-12-05en_UK
dc.subject.tagCOVID-19en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBosó Pérez, Raquel|0000-0001-7342-4566en_UK
local.rioxx.authorReid, David|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMaxwell, Karen J|0000-0002-2264-6510en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGibbs, Jo|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDema, Emily|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBonell, Christopher|0000-0002-6253-6498en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMercer, Catherine H|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSonnenberg, Pam|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorField, Nigel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMitchell, Kirstin R|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Chief Scientist Office|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000589en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|The Wellcome Trust|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University College London|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000765en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2026-01-21en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2026-01-21|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBoso-Perez et al (2022). Access to SRH during covid pandemic.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2515-2009en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Boso-Perez et al (2022). Access to SRH during covid pandemic.pdfFulltext - Published Version358.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.