Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36480
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Ten_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcFadden, Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWhittaker, Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBoardman, J Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMarryat, Len_UK
dc.contributor.otherWhittaker, Anneen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-15T01:04:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-15T01:04:17Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-23en_UK
dc.identifier.other75en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/36480-
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background The increasing rise of women using opioids during pregnancy across the world has warranted concern over the access and quality of antenatal care received by this group. Scotland has particularly high levels of opioid use, and correspondingly, pregnancies involving women who use opioids. The purpose of this study was to investigate the different models of antenatal care for women using opioids during pregnancy in three Scottish Health Board Areas, and to explore multi-disciplinary practitioners’ perceptions of the strengths and challenges of working with women who use opioids through these specialist services. Methods Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with health and social care workers who had experience of providing antenatal and postnatal care to women who use drugs across three Scottish Health Board Areas: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, NHS Lothian, and NHS Tayside. Framework Analysis was used to analyse interview data. The five stages of framework analysis were undertaken: familiarisation, identifying the thematic framework, indexing, charting, and mapping and interpretation. Results Each area had a specialist antenatal pathway for women who used substances. Pathways varied, with some consisting of specialist midwives, and others comprising a multidisciplinary team (e.g. midwife, mental health nurse, social workers, and an obstetrician). Referral criteria for the specialist service differed between health board areas. These specialised pathways presented several key strengths: continuity of care with one midwife and a strong patient-practitioner relationship; increased number of appointments, support and scans; and highly specialised healthcare professionals with experience of working with substance use. In spite of this, there were a number of limitations to these pathways: a lack of additional psychological support for the mother; some staff not having the skills to engage with the complexity of patients who use substances; and problems with patient engagement. Conclusions Across the three areas, there appears to be high-quality multi-disciplinary antenatal services for women who use opioids during pregnancy. However, referral criteria vary and some services appear more comprehensive than others. Further research is needed into the perceptions of women who use opioids on facilitators and barriers to antenatal care, and provision in rural regions of Scotland.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_UK
dc.relationHughes T, McFadden A, Whittaker A, Boardman JP & Marryat L (2024) Antenatal care of women who use opioids: a qualitative study of practitioners’ perceptions of strengths and challenges of current service provision in Scotland. Whittaker A (Researcher) <i>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</i>, 24 (1), Art. No.: 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06265-w; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06265-wen_UK
dc.rightsThe Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectOpioid-related disordersen_UK
dc.subjectSubstance useen_UK
dc.subjectPregnancyen_UK
dc.subjectPrenatal educationen_UK
dc.subjectHealthcare disparitiesen_UK
dc.subjectHealth inequalitiesen_UK
dc.titleAntenatal care of women who use opioids: a qualitative study of practitioners’ perceptions of strengths and challenges of current service provision in Scotlanden_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12884-024-06265-wen_UK
dc.identifier.pmid38262968en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Pregnancy and Childbirthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2393en_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2393en_UK
dc.citation.volume24en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEconomic and Social Research Councilen_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06265-wen_UK
dc.author.emailanne.whittaker@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date23/01/2024en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001155089000003en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85182822027en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2066933en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8960-5070en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8960-5070en_UK
dc.date.accepted2024-01-09en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-01-09en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-11-13en_UK
dc.subject.tagMaternityen_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHughes, T|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcFadden, A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhittaker, A|0000-0001-8960-5070en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBoardman, J P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMarryat, L|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Economic and Social Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269en_UK
local.rioxx.contributorWhittaker, Anne|0000-0001-8960-5070en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2024-11-13en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2024-11-13|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenames12884-024-06265-w.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1471-2393en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12884-024-06265-w.pdfFulltext - Published Version922.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.